Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2

GPT-6.1 Terra leads Muse Spark 1.2 on coding, 77.4 to 50.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($5.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
9
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
50.9
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.25
7
vs boards won of 16 shared

GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.9 for Muse Spark 1.2.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($4.25 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
16
GPT-6.1 Terra only
20
Muse Spark 1.2 only
75
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 50.9 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 19.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): GPT-6.1 Terra 49.5% against Muse Spark 1.2 6.1%, 57.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding51
Agentic work12
Reasoning10
Knowledge01
Web design13
General10
All shared boards97
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index51
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev16731534GPT-6.1 Terra
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%6.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.0%79.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode55.1%57.4%Muse Spark 1.2
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ALE-Bench2608.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1506Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1508Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16571526GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML17191543GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index51.0Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1220Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1142Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1031Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1149Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1059Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench research73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench browser93.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench long agentic48.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)15.2%32.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)26.0%43.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)1.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-Agents68.3%45.4%GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%45.5%GPT-6.1 Terra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Mystery game puzzles74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
EBR-bench78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1477Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)35.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tier 492.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified57.3%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1494Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1509Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites12831311Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components12771296Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev13481300GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1333Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1299Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12951311Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1280Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1279Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench design82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Vals Index60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench data analysis82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%79.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Furniture assembly79.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1437Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1475Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1454Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1474Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1451Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1442Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MultiChallenge74.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 TerraMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 26, 2026August 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$5.00$4.25
Coding index77.450.9
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.9 for Muse Spark 1.2. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($4.25 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2" title="GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.2</a></p>