Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.1

GPT-6.1 Terra leads Muse Spark 1.1 on coding, 77.4 to 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($5.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
9
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
73.3
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 15 shared, 1 tied

GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 70.3 for Muse Spark 1.1.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($4.25 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
15
GPT-6.1 Terra only
21
Muse Spark 1.1 only
87
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 24.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
APEX-Agents: GPT-6.1 Terra 68.3% against Muse Spark 1.1 31.8%, 36.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding41
Agentic work11
Reasoning001 tie
Knowledge01
Web design31
General11
All shared boards951 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index41
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev16731542GPT-6.1 Terra
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.0%72.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCode55.1%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
ALE-Bench2608.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16571532GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML17191539GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index51.0Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1174Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1169Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1091Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1112Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1049Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench research73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench browser93.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench long agentic48.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)15.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)26.0%38.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)1.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-Agents68.3%31.8%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%46.2%Tie
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
EBR-bench78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1486Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)35.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tier 492.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MathArenaNot measured42.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified57.3%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1480Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites12831269GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: UI components12771282Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev13481268GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1268Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1257Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12951275GPT-6.1 Terra
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1231Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench design82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Vals Index60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench data analysis82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%77.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Furniture assembly79.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1435Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1471Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1515Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1467Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1447Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1463Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1497Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1448Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1437Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallenge74.2%75.3%Muse Spark 1.1
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 TerraMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 26, 2026July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$5.00$4.25
Coding index77.470.3
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 70.3 for Muse Spark 1.1. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($4.25 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1" title="GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Spark 1.1</a></p>