GPT-6.1 Sol vs gpt-oss-120b
Updated October 21, 2026. 42 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
vs boards won of 42 shared
Decision reading
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for coding: it scores 88.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.5 for gpt-oss-120b.
Pick gpt-oss-120b when output tokens cost 16.7x less.
Model AGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI88.7/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel Bgpt-oss-120bOpenAI34.5/1002 independent benchmarks$0.51 per solved task
- Shared results
- 42
- GPT-6.1 Sol only
- 53
- gpt-oss-120b only
- 36
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol scores 88.7 against 34.5.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol leads, 51.8 against 11.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AA Agentic Index result, 3.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a GPQA Diamond result, 78.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AIME result, 92.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a MMLU Pro result, 79.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol leads, 1321 against 968.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GPT-6.1 Sol has a Vals Index result, 63.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b
GPT-6.1 Sol $0.0070, gpt-oss-120b $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has the number, $0.51.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-6.1 Sol 88.7 from 2 benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b 34.5 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 55.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Mystery game puzzles: GPT-6.1 Sol 80.0% against gpt-oss-120b 2.0%, 78.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-6.1 Sol $10.00 against gpt-oss-120b $0.60 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-6.1 Sol takes 1.05M tokens, gpt-oss-120b 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-6.1 Sol | Bars | gpt-oss-120b | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 16 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 42 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 41.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 26.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveBench coding | 96.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1753 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 30.4 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 55.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 65.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 3.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 96.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 43.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 39.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SciCode | 55.8% | 34.0% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 23.5% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 18.7% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 48.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2743.8 | 575.6 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1478 | 1379 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1476 | 1387 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1754 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1800 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1702 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 51.8 | 11.6 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 168.4 | 139.8 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 3.7 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1190 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1250 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LiveBench research | 83.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LiveBench browser | 88.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 73.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 50.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 52.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 21.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 38.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 6.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 70.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 52.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Vals Science Index | 59.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 28.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 65.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| APEX-Agents | 60.0% | 4.4% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| METR time horizons | Not measured | 56.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SpireClimb | 24.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | -$22 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 78.5% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 92.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 46.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 78.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 52.9% | 19.6% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 95.4% | 75.8% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 22.1% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Chess puzzles | 68.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 80.0% | 2.0% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| EBR-bench | 54.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1463 | 1364 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1489 | 1356 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1465 | 1368 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1306 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1356 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 92.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 94.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 92.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 93.4 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 93.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 88.9% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 93.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| ProofBench | 99.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1489 | 1389 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1513 | 1386 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 79.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.9% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 91.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 48.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 80.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1444 | 1382 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1433 | 1388 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1471 | 1355 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1445 | 1359 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1321 | 968 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1321 | 927 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1389 | 992 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1278 | 987 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1461 | 901 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1345 | 963 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LiveBench design | 82.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index160
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 63.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 82.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 59.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 46.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 86.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 69.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 84.0% | 52.0% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| DTBench | 96.5% | 76.3% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMCA | 62.8% | 22.1% | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 44.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 25.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Furniture assembly | 80.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1366 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1466 | 1318 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1425 | 1274 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1375 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1433 | 1351 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1487 | 1385 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1353 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1331 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1282 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1460 | 1370 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1439 | 1389 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1457 | 1343 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1353 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1442 | 1340 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1458 | 1319 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1444 | 1306 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1426 | 1292 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1274 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1289 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1301 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.0070Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0004Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.130Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0093Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.500Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.036Exceeds the context window
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 29, 2026 | August 5, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | 88.7 | 34.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.51 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than gpt-oss-120b for coding?
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for coding: it scores 88.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.5 for gpt-oss-120b. Pick gpt-oss-120b when output tokens cost 16.7x less.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or gpt-oss-120b?
GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; gpt-oss-120b costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Sol or gpt-oss-120b?
GPT-6.1 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Sol vs gpt-oss-120b comparison based on?
42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and gpt-oss-120b's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.