Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Mini vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads GPT-5 Mini on coding, 47.4 to 34.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5 Mini costs 2.1x less per output token ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5 MiniOpenAI
Coding
34.2
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
8
vs boards won of 8 shared

GPT-5 Mini or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.2 for GPT-5 Mini.

Pick GPT-5 Mini for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
8
GPT-5 Mini only
93
Muse Spark Open only
20
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Mini 34.2 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 40.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5 Mini 14.2% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 62.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 Mini $2.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Mini takes 400K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5 MiniBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Web design02
General01
All shared boards08
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified59.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Multilingual39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.2%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SciCode39.0%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
WeirdML52.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1406Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1394Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index145.3155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vending-Bench 2-$31Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)55.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)78.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.8%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.5%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI54.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-24.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Chess puzzles24.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
VPCT40.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1380Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1379Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1383Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
AIME91.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 346.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1378Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1380Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified21.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1371Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1380Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1375Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1358Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite38.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11251310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1103Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev11291282Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1131Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D1036Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: SVG1091Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
IFBench75.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMCA34.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1357Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1325Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1379Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1363Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1341Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1362Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1378Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1363Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1355Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1344Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1340Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1216Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1214Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1199Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1205Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1217Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1226Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-5 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-5 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-5 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Mini and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 MiniMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.00$4.25
Coding index34.247.4
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.08Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Mini better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.2 for GPT-5 Mini. Pick GPT-5 Mini for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-5 Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Mini or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 Mini vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-mini-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="GPT-5 Mini vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-mini-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5 Mini vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>