Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.4 leads Qwen3.7 Plus on coding, 64.4 to 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 11.7x less per output token ($1.28 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 65 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GPT-5.4 Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
53
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
12
vs boards won of 65 shared

GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 11.7x cheaper ($1.28 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by SkillsBench (Vals AI) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Model AGPT-5.4OpenAI64.4/1003 independent benchmarks$1.02 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
65
GPT-5.4 only
45
Qwen3.7 Plus only
10
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 14.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: GPT-5.4 78.6% against Qwen3.7 Plus 34.4%, 44.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 11.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding61
Intelligence20
Agentic work01
Reasoning90
Math40
Knowledge41
Web design17
General272
All shared boards5312
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index61
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev1464Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
AA Coding Index71.155.9GPT-5.4
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%46.4%GPT-5.4
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%12.9%GPT-5.4
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%54.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
SciCodeNot measured46.1%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%47.0%GPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: coding14961473GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: software and IT14911473GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: React1454Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1478Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.025.2GPT-5.4
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3147.0GPT-5.4
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured17.5Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1087Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1031Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%93.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%90.0%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%35.6%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%87.9%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%17.0%GPT-5.4
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851460GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: expert15071466GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14791460GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: diagrams13271292GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: homework13361295GPT-5.4
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%93.3%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%34.4%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math14881467GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: mathematical work14971470GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%66.2%GPT-5.4
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science14791464GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14581464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14861451GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: business and finance14741435GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites11981269Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: UI components12121258Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: game dev11941261Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: data viz11961276Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: 3D10651238Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: all code categories11791269Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: SVG11411208Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: ASCII art11881143GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index272
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%39.3%GPT-5.4
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench73.9%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%73.0%GPT-5.4
DTBench94.4%84.0%GPT-5.4
LMCA52.0%37.6%GPT-5.4
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text14691454GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: instruction following14691439GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: creative writing14391438GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision13031278GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: English14671458GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: non-English14651445GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Chinese15201509GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: German14721471GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Japanese14851412GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Korean14491413GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: French14931472GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Spanish14521457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14801457GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Polish14721449GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: multi-turn14821459GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: longer queries14731454GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: writing and language14581437GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14381422GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: English13011280GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: Chinese13541332GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: reading text13121288GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: humor12841261GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12831258GPT-5.4
LMArena Document14711444GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4Qwen3.7 Plus
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.32
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.28
Coding index64.433.2
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 11.7x cheaper ($1.28 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by SkillsBench (Vals AI) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>