Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

GPT-5.4 leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash on coding, 64.4 to 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 25.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
1
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
6
vs boards won of 7 shared

GPT-5.4 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.0 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
7
GPT-5.4 only
111
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
13
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 14.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: GPT-5.4 1454 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1609, 24.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General10
All shared boards16
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured83.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev14641587MiniMax M3.1 Flash
AA Coding Index71.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured25.3%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%73.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.4%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14541609MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML14781529MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.042.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1031Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured92.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured34.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured7.5%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-Agents52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MCP Atlas70.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%48.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math1488Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MathArena37.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1474Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PRBench Finance45.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PRBench Legal44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1198Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: UI components1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game dev1194Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: data viz1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3D1065Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVG1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.8%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured71.4%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%79.7%GPT-5.4
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English1467Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1465Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: French1493Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1480Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1482Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EQ-Bench 41272Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.60
Coding index64.459.0
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.0 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>