GPT-5.4 Nano vs Inkling
GPT-5.4 Nano leads Inkling on coding, 44.8 to 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 3.2x less per output token ($1.25 vs $4.05 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.4 Nano or Inkling: which to pick
Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for coding: it scores 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for Inkling, though on 2 benchmarks against 6.
Pick Inkling for a larger context window (524K against 400K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 69
- GPT-5.4 Nano only
- 16
- Inkling only
- 33
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano scores 44.8 against 31.5.
2 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Inkling
Inkling leads, 25.0 against 20.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Inkling
Inkling leads, 22.5 against 16.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Inkling
Inkling leads, 87.1% against 77.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AIME result, 88.8%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Inkling
Inkling leads, 86.3% against 77.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Inkling has a Design Arena: websites result, 1224.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Inkling has a Vals Index result, 29.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Inkling
Inkling takes 524K tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano $0.0008, Inkling $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano $0.14, Inkling $0.76.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 13.6 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI-2: GPT-5.4 Nano 5.7% against Inkling 36.5%, 30.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 3.2x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Inkling 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Nano | Bars | Inkling | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 4 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 10 | ||
| Math | 3 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 11 | ||
| General | 1 | 22 | ||
| All shared boards | 12 | 57 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index65
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1414 | Only Inkling measured |
| AA Coding Index | 56.1 | 52.1 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | 85.5% | Inkling |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 69.8% | 77.6% | Inkling |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 26.1% | 19.2% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 14.5% | 11.8% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 41.6% | 47.6% | Inkling |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 26.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| SciCode | 47.2% | 47.0% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 14.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 4.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| WeirdML | 49.2% | 32.3% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| ALE-Bench | 1004.5 | 946.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1404 | 1466 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1402 | 1465 | Inkling |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1404 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1399 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 20.7 | 25.0 | Inkling |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.0 | 148.4 | Inkling |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 16.0 | 22.5 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1196 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 59.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 16.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 14.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 38.2% | 46.6% | Inkling |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 5.0% | 15.3% | Inkling |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 6.3% | 28.4% | Inkling |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 44.8% | 38.4% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 76.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 33.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.5% | 87.1% | Inkling |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 78.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 73.6% | 78.5% | Inkling |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 81.7% | 87.2% | Inkling |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.3% | 31.9% | Inkling |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 78.5% | 88.3% | Inkling |
| ARC-AGI | 51.5% | 79.5% | Inkling |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | 36.5% | Inkling |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 50.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | 21.0% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Mystery game puzzles | 9.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1381 | 1451 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1396 | 1466 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1387 | 1448 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1210 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1225 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 39.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 87.8% | 88.9% | Inkling |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 44.9% | 33.3% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 12.2% | 4.9% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| ProofBench | 5.0% | 0.0% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: math | 1405 | 1479 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1409 | 1460 | Inkling |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 77.2% | 86.3% | Inkling |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 77.9% | 83.0% | Inkling |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 51.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 61.2% | 68.6% | Inkling |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 67.4% | 75.3% | Inkling |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 59.1% | 64.0% | Inkling |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 41.0% | 41.2% | Inkling |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | 40.3% | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: science | 1374 | 1455 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1369 | 1447 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1368 | 1448 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1366 | 1438 | Inkling |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1224 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1198 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1165 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1156 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1160 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1205 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1108 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1089 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 58.3% | Only Inkling measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index122
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 29.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 72.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 38.1% | 36.5% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 77.1% | 85.4% | Inkling |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 47.6% | 49.4% | Inkling |
| IFBench | 75.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.7% | 77.3% | Inkling |
| DTBench | 80.3% | 87.5% | Inkling |
| LMCA | 36.9% | 37.6% | Inkling |
| LMArena Text | 1372 | 1442 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1362 | 1425 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1315 | 1390 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision | 1196 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1381 | 1442 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1359 | 1434 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1391 | 1493 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: German | 1368 | 1445 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1343 | 1429 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1321 | 1403 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: French | 1395 | 1455 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1371 | 1449 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1363 | 1430 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1366 | 1450 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1382 | 1437 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1365 | 1435 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1338 | 1404 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1325 | 1394 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1202 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1232 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1204 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1161 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1141 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1159 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano | Thinking Machines Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 17, 2026 | July 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 400K | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.975 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.25 | $4.05 |
| Coding index | 44.8 | 31.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.14 | $0.76 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Inkling for coding?
Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for coding: it scores 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for Inkling, though on 2 benchmarks against 6. Pick Inkling for a larger context window (524K against 400K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Inkling?
GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $0.975 and $4.05. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.14 and Inkling $0.76.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Inkling?
Inkling, with 524K tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Inkling comparison based on?
69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.