Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads GPT-5.4 Mini on coding, 59.0 to 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 7.5x less per output token ($0.60 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
44.0
Output $/M
$4.50
0
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

GPT-5.4 Mini is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
11
GPT-5.4 Mini only
79
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
9
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 23.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: GPT-5.4 Mini 1386 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1609, 35.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards011
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured83.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev13971587MiniMax M3.1 Flash
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%25.3%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%73.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SciCode52.1%53.4%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierCode27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React13861609MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML14191529MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.142.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index17.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured92.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured34.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%32.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%34.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured7.5%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MCP Atlas56.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%48.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles11.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1424Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1435Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1285Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1414Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench designNot measured74.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.8%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured71.4%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%79.7%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMCA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1375Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1441Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1393Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1222Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.50$0.60
Coding index35.859.0
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved task$0.70Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. GPT-5.4 Mini is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>