Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small leads GPT-5.1-Codex on coding, 27.3 to 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling Small costs 8.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
27.3
Overall
43.6
Output $/M
$1.20
8
vs boards won of 8 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling Small: which to pick

Pick Inkling Small for coding: it scores 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex.

GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
8
GPT-5.1-Codex only
18
Inkling Small only
76
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 6.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: GPT-5.1-Codex 1337 against Inkling Small 1409, 10.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-CodexBarsInkling SmallTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards08
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev13371409Inkling Small
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%85.9%Inkling Small
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%19.1%Inkling Small
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1450Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1447Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13461398Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.725.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.3Only Inkling Small measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.6%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%33.3%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.5%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured84.0%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured40.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1423Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1441Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1429Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1251Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1257Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured90.0%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured46.3%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1459Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1441Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only Inkling Small measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling Small measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured69.6%Only Inkling Small measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Inkling Small measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Inkling Small measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only Inkling Small measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured32.7%Only Inkling Small measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%75.7%Inkling Small
LMArena TextNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1334Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1237Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1421Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1464Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1367Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1435Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1422Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1394Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1357Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1292Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1207Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling Small
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexThinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025July 30, 2026
Context window400K524K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.45
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.20
Coding index15.327.3
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.892$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Inkling Small for coding?

Pick Inkling Small for coding: it scores 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex. GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling Small?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.1-Codex costs $0.892 and Inkling Small $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-small" title="GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling Small</a></p>