LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Kimi K2.5

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
18.2
Overall
8.4
Output $/M
$10.00
2
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Coding
58.5
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$2.50
9
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2.5 for coding: it scores 58.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.2 for GPT-4o (2024-11-20).

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) when what matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI) or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
13
Kimi K2.5 only
87
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 18.2 from 1 benchmark, Kimi K2.5 58.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 83.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 11.9% against Kimi K2.5 95.6%, 83.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Kimi K2.5 $2.50 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Kimi K2.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsKimi K2.5Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Math01
Knowledge23
All shared boards29
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured70.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured67.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Kimi K2.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.8Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%83.9%Kimi K2.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured7.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured43.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%45.6%Kimi K2.5
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured821.6Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1483Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1471Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1429Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1426Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1439Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.423.5Kimi K2.5
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.1Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1136Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1114Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1124Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1219Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured35.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OSWorldNot measured63.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1,198Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
GPQA Diamond53.8%84.1%Kimi K2.5
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%84.3%Kimi K2.5
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ARC-AGINot measured65.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured11.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured46.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1453Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1466Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1460Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1282Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1297Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
AIME11.9%95.6%Kimi K2.5
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1470Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1473Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
MMLU Pro72.6%85.9%Kimi K2.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%58.7%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%68.3%Kimi K2.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%74.2%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%66.5%Kimi K2.5
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.4%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured34.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1459Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1448Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1427Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1249Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1236Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1207Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1219Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1205Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1236Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1149Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1165Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured70.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured86.1%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CL-benchNot measured19.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured13.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1431Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1422Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1269Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1453Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1433Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1494Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1441Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1423Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1412Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1454Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1450Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1435Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1445Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1444Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1445Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1425Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1417Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1328Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1276Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1284Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1257Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1285Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1269Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Kimi K2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Kimi K2.5$0.0018Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Kimi K2.5$0.033Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2.5$0.125Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Kimi K2.5
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024January 27, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.50
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.50
Coding index18.258.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.24
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Kimi K2.5 for coding?

Pick Kimi K2.5 for coding: it scores 58.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.2 for GPT-4o (2024-11-20). Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) when what matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI) or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Kimi K2.5?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 costs $0.50 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Kimi K2.5 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next