Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 leads GPT-4 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.2 to 7.0, and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 4.0x less per output token ($7.50 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
0
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

GPT-4 Turbo or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
36
GPT-4 Turbo only
6
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
45
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 30.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: GPT-4 Turbo 1223 against Mistral Medium 3.5 1432, 34.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 Turbo $30.00 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 Turbo takes 128K tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4 TurboBarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge04
General021
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1264Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding Index21.546.9Mistral Medium 3.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured5.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured40.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured764.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding12681460Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: software and IT12671458Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1308Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.014.2Mistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3141.4Mistral Medium 3.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured7.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured4.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured34.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.1%13.8%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts12511436Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: expert12231432Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12661445Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1230Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured41.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math12721431Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work12681440Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MMLU81.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: science12561428Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12391409Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: legal and government12651437Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: business and finance12221426Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1142Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1076Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1060Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1121Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured949Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1062Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured37.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured34.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBench61.6%75.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMCA9.8%26.1%Mistral Medium 3.5
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text12721421Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: instruction following12491415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: creative writing12681374Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision10901222Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: English12911433Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: non-English12451404Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Chinese12421444Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: German12591453Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Japanese1194Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean11871384Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: French12761448Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Spanish12601411Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Russian12591395Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Polish13021430Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn12671423Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: longer queries12541415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: writing and language12791384Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12581382Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: English10971240Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: Chinese10451244Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1233Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1216Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1198Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.025Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.590Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$2.30Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3.5
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 9, 2024April 30, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$10.00$1.50
Output $/Mtok$30.00$7.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked25.5
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Mistral Medium 3.5?

GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 Turbo or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next