Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads GLM 5.3 Flash on coding, 59.0 to 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GLM 5.3 Flash costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
Coding
57.7
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$0.50
9
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
11
vs boards won of 20 shared

GLM 5.3 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are level for coding, 57.7 against 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick GLM 5.3 Flash for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for work measured by LiveBench coding or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
20
GLM 5.3 Flash only
82
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 Flash 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 10.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GLM 5.3 Flash 30.8% against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 73.9%, 43.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5.3 FlashBarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding43
Intelligence01
Agentic work24
Reasoning02
Web design10
General21
All shared boards911
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index43
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding80.6%83.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev16071587GLM 5.3 Flash
AA Coding Index71.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)92.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)37.4%25.3%GLM 5.3 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)30.8%73.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)62.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SciCode51.6%53.4%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
FrontierCode31.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierSWE18.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ALE-Bench303.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1507Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1500Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16241609GLM 5.3 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15771529GLM 5.3 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1578Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index41.842.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index153.1Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index50.9Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench research70.1%72.7%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench browser84.0%92.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench long agentic28.4%34.7%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.6%32.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%34.1%GLM 5.3 Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.4%7.5%GLM 5.3 Flash
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)55.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
APEX-Agents52.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond86.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning77.6%82.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%48.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGI91.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-265.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1490Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1511Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1488Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1317Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1318Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 355.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 417.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1503Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro86.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1484Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1475Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1473Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1271Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1314Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1277Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1315Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1281Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1284Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench design77.2%74.0%GLM 5.3 Flash
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals Index50.9%53.8%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench data analysis76.4%71.4%GLM 5.3 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%79.7%GLM 5.3 Flash
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text1471Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1478Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1441Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1294Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1474Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1462Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1531Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1462Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1444Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1475Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1465Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1450Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1469Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1481Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1455Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1440Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1295Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1363Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1299Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1279Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0090Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.035Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerZ.aiMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 26, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding index57.759.0
Independent measurements behind it64
Cost per solved task$0.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

GLM 5.3 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are level for coding, 57.7 against 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick GLM 5.3 Flash for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for work measured by LiveBench coding or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5.3 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>