LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Updated October 21, 2026. 50 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 4.5Z.ai
Coding
64.2
Overall
12.8
Output $/M
$2.20
2
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
Coding
76.7
Overall
47.0
Output $/M
$20.00
48
vs boards won of 50 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-5.6 Sol for coding: it scores 76.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.2 for GLM 4.5.

Pick GLM 4.5 when output tokens cost 9.1x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Shared results
50
GLM 4.5 only
10
GPT-5.6 Sol only
86
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 64.2 from 1 benchmark, GPT-5.6 Sol 76.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: GLM 4.5 344.8 against GPT-5.6 Sol 2176.9, 61.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 $2.20 against GPT-5.6 Sol $20.00 per million output tokens, 9.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 takes 131K tokens, GPT-5.6 Sol 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5BarsGPT-5.6 SolTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge17
Web design07
General118
All shared boards248
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
SWE-bench Verified64.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured89.7%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1616Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured77.4Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)67.5%82.6%GPT-5.6 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured96.2%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured80.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured52.9%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured85.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured20.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured76.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured57.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%65.9%GPT-5.6 Sol
FrontierCodeNot measured47.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierSWENot measured32.2%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GSO-BenchNot measured76.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
WeirdML40.6%88.8%GPT-5.6 Sol
MirrorCodeNot measured20.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ALE-Bench344.82176.9GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: coding14341496GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: software and IT14401489GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1620Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1618Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1609Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.847.0GPT-5.6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured162.8Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured50.2Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1245Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1261Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1249Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1246Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1260Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1267Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1286Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1240Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench researchNot measured54.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured48.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured30.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured20.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured41.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured8.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.0%85.1%GPT-5.6 Sol
OSWorld 2.0Not measured27.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
BALROGNot measured60.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured36.2%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,619Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%95.2%GPT-5.6 Sol
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%94.1%GPT-5.6 Sol
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%49.5%GPT-5.6 Sol
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured93.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ARC-AGINot measured97.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured92.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SimpleBenchNot measured64.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured59.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured58.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
EBR-benchNot measured44.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291483GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: expert14331517GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14291477GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1305Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AA Math Index73.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured89.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured82.9%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ProofBenchNot measured83.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: math14271473GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301496GPT-5.6 Sol
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
MMLU Pro81.2%89.1%GPT-5.6 Sol
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.6%87.0%GPT-5.6 Sol
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.0%64.4%GPT-5.6 Sol
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.4%74.8%GPT-5.6 Sol
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.3%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MedQA (Vals AI)90.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.0%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured69.7%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: science14441455GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14551431GLM 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14381476GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: business and finance14201457GPT-5.6 Sol
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
Design Arena: websites11701321GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: UI components11441338GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: game dev11451368GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: data viz11591323GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: 3D11701385GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: all code categories11651341GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: SVG10961316GPT-5.6 Sol
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1302Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench designNot measured81.6%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.8%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured52.6%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured72.6%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
IFBench44.1%72.7%GPT-5.6 Sol
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%84.0%GPT-5.6 Sol
DTBenchNot measured95.7%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMCANot measured58.5%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)73.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured93.1%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured56.7%Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text14301457GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: instruction following14041483GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: creative writing13951449GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena VisionNot measured1281Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: English14371457GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: non-English14171451GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: Chinese14651525GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: German14071476GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: Japanese14151472GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: Korean13801442GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: French14181472GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: Spanish14541443GLM 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14131471GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: Polish14221459GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: multi-turn14151461GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: longer queries14121481GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: writing and language14031462GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14041450GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1313Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1290Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1246Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1283Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1483Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GPT-5.6 SolLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.0017Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Sol$0.014Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.037Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Sol$0.260Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.142Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.6 Sol$1.00Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025July 9, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$4.00
Output $/Mtok$2.20$20.00
Coding index64.276.7
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.20
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 better than GPT-5.6 Sol for coding?

Pick GPT-5.6 Sol for coding: it scores 76.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.2 for GLM 4.5. Pick GLM 4.5 when output tokens cost 9.1x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Sol only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.5's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.6 Sol's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next