Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling Small

Gemma 2 27B costs 1.8x less per output token than Inkling Small ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemma 2 27B Replace Inkling Small
Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
0
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
27.3
Overall
43.6
Output $/M
$1.20
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

Gemma 2 27B or Inkling Small: which to pick

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million).

Model AGemma 2 27BGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BInkling SmallThinking Machines27.3/1004 independent benchmarks$0.16 per solved task
Shared results
32
Gemma 2 27B only
4
Inkling Small only
52
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 55.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 2 27B 1.4% against Inkling Small 90.0%, 88.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 2 27BBarsInkling SmallTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge05
General017
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: coding12111450Inkling Small
LMArena Text: software and IT12281447Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1398Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.7Only Inkling Small measured
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1150.3Inkling Small
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.6%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)36.5%88.5%Inkling Small
ARC-AGINot measured84.0%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured40.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11981423Inkling Small
LMArena Text: expert11711441Inkling Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12061429Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1251Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1257Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
OTIS Mock AIME1.4%90.0%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured46.3%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
MATH level 527.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: math12121459Inkling Small
LMArena Text: mathematical work12211441Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only Inkling Small measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)68.0%83.0%Inkling Small
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured69.6%Only Inkling Small measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Inkling Small measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Inkling Small measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
MMLU75.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: science12281428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11981413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: legal and government12411415Inkling Small
LMArena Text: business and finance12081413Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured32.7%Only Inkling Small measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured75.7%Only Inkling Small measured
DTBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMCA7.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text12311413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: instruction following12061399Inkling Small
LMArena Text: creative writing12401334Inkling Small
LMArena VisionNot measured1237Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: English12421421Inkling Small
LMArena Text: non-English12171401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Chinese12211464Inkling Small
LMArena Text: German12091408Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Japanese11751401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Korean11741367Inkling Small
LMArena Text: French12481435Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Spanish12281422Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Russian12341394Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Polish12771428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: multi-turn12241416Inkling Small
LMArena Text: longer queries12301402Inkling Small
LMArena Text: writing and language12491357Inkling Small
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12121352Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1292Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1207Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.034Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.137Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 2 27B and Inkling Small
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 2 27BThinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerGoogleThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 13, 2024July 30, 2026
Context window8K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.65$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.65$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked27.3
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Inkling Small for coding?

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling Small?

Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling Small only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next