Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads Ling 3.0 Flash on coding, 77.9 to 29.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Ling 3.0 Flash costs 61.7x less per output token ($0.1215 vs $7.50 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 HydrogenGoogle
Coding
77.9
Overall
77.1
Output $/M
$7.50
4
Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI
Coding
29.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.1215
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Ling 3.0 Flash: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Hydrogen for coding: it scores 77.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 61.7x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $7.50 per million).

Shared results
4
Gemini 4 Hydrogen only
46
Ling 3.0 Flash only
23
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Hydrogen 77.9 from 4 benchmarks, Ling 3.0 Flash 29.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 69.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 4 Hydrogen 87.8% against Ling 3.0 Flash 2.9%, 84.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Hydrogen $7.50 against Ling 3.0 Flash $0.1215 per million output tokens, 61.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Hydrogen takes 1.05M tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 HydrogenBarsLing 3.0 FlashTies
Coding20
Agentic work10
Reasoning10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding78.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena WebDev1704Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured50.6Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured65.2%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.8%2.9%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.2%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured27.9%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured42.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)54.0%0.0%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
FrontierCode 2.039.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: coding1516Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1513Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena WebDev: React1724Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1743Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
GameBench 2Not measured18.1Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
CursorBench 4.057.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured19.3Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench browser77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench long agentic61.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured30.3%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)52.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)53.8%0.0%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.8%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning88.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.5%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.7%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%7.2%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)66.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1520Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: expert1558Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1514Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: math1507Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured82.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.9%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.7%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.3%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
AA-Omniscience46.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: science1519Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1532Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1320Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Design Arena: game dev1369Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Design Arena: 3D1415Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Design Arena: all code categories1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench design77.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Vals Index68.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench data analysis83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.9%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.0%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
GDPval-AANot measured956Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1519Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1509Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: English1499Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: non-English1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1631Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: French1512Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: Russian1492Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1524Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1500Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.0053Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.098Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0024Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.375Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Ling 3.0 Flash
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 HydrogeninclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash
MakerGoogleinclusionAI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 12, 2026July 23, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.0405
Output $/Mtok$7.50$0.1215
Coding index77.929.6
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.05
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen better than Ling 3.0 Flash for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Hydrogen for coding: it scores 77.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 61.7x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $7.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.0405 and $0.1215. Cost per solved task is known for Ling 3.0 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Ling 3.0 Flash comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Hydrogen's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Ling 3.0 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash" title="Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Ling 3.0 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Ling 3.0 Flash</a></p>