Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Gemini 4 Carbon leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash on coding, 86.6 to 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 16.7x less per output token ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
Coding
86.6
Overall
88.3
Output $/M
$10.00
24
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
55.7
Overall
53.7
Output $/M
$0.60
2
vs boards won of 26 shared

Gemini 4 Carbon or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.7 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by LiveBench browser or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
26
Gemini 4 Carbon only
47
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 55.7 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 30.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Gemini 4 Carbon 2374.7 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 217.8, 71.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 CarbonBarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work51
Reasoning30
Knowledge20
Web design10
General31
All shared boards242
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding91.0%68.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev17681584Gemini 4 Carbon
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.1%25.3%Gemini 4 Carbon
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)89.1%73.9%Gemini 4 Carbon
SciCodeNot measured53.4%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)65.2%25.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierCode 2.040.6%20.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierSWE61.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ALE-Bench2374.7217.8Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: coding1564Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1552Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena WebDev: React17921603Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev: HTML17701558Gemini 4 Carbon
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured96.6%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
GameBench 2Not measured41.0Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
CursorBench 4.060.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index60.029.1Gemini 4 Carbon
Epoch Capabilities Index169.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1224Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench research92.5%76.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench browser80.0%80.6%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench long agentic72.7%25.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)51.8%32.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)55.8%34.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)17.5%7.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
APEX-Agents84.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Vending-Bench 2$16,484Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning90.6%82.9%Gemini 4 Carbon
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%28.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)69.0%32.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
ARC-AGI-294.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
SimpleBench92.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Chess puzzles78.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Mystery game puzzles73.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
EBR-bench87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1551Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: expert1582Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FrontierMath, tier 495.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
MathArena85.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA-Omniscience53.5-6.4Gemini 4 Carbon
SimpleQA Verified77.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: science1535Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1525Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1542Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1520Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite78.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured45.6%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
PRBench Legal53.3%45.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1319Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: UI components1357Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: game dev1326Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: 3D1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1348Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench design80.2%71.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals Index70.5%53.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench data analysis86.5%71.4%Gemini 4 Carbon
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%79.7%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GDPval-AA17331465Gemini 4 Carbon
Furniture assembly77.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1539Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1533Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: English1530Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: non-English1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1613Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: Russian1560Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1569Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1549Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1542Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.0070Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.130Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.500Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerGoogleMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 10, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.60
Coding index86.655.7
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.7 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by LiveBench browser or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>