Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Updated October 21, 2026. 49 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
vs boards won of 49 shared
Decision reading
Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when output tokens cost 7.8x less.
Model AGemini 4 ArgonGoogle81.0/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
- Shared results
- 49
- Gemini 4 Argon only
- 43
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 26
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon scores 81.0 against 33.2.
5 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads, 52.6 against 25.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a AA Agentic Index result, 17.5.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads, 1315 against 1269.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Argon has a Vals Index result, 69.2%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus
Gemini 4 Argon $0.0070, Qwen3.7 Plus $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 31.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierCode: Gemini 4 Argon 47.5% against Qwen3.7 Plus 10.2%, 57.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 7.8x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Bars | Qwen3.7 Plus | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 7 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 16 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 49 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 89.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 55.9 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 57.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 91.9% | 46.4% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 68.2% | 12.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 57.7% | 52.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 56.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 21.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 77.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 46.1% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| FrontierCode | 47.5% | 10.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2100.1 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1546 | 1473 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1556 | 1473 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1692 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1643 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 52.6 | 25.2 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.4 | 147.0 | Gemini 4 Argon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 17.5 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1147 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LiveBench research | 83.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 69.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 44.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 65.4% | 38.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 44.6% | 10.5% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 54.8% | 16.4% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 27.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 75.2% | 49.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 76.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 44.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Vals Science Index | 55.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 52.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 4.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 93.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| APEX-Agents | 82.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 2.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $13,718 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 95.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 90.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 57.1% | 35.6% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 96.4% | 87.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Chess puzzles | 59.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 64.0% | 17.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| EBR-bench | 64.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1546 | 1460 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1550 | 1466 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1548 | 1460 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1292 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1295 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 93.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 86.0% | 34.4% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 78.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| ProofBench | 99.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1536 | 1467 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1557 | 1470 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.2% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 58.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 76.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1548 | 1464 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1555 | 1464 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1548 | 1451 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1525 | 1435 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1315 | 1269 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1331 | 1261 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1376 | 1262 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1337 | 1275 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1389 | 1239 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1328 | 1269 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1208 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1144 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LiveBench design | 73.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index160
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 69.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 85.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 69.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 53.6% | 39.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 87.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 53.9% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 78.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.7% | 73.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| DTBench | 97.6% | 84.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMCA | 63.7% | 37.6% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Furniture assembly | 72.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text | 1532 | 1454 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1534 | 1439 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1527 | 1438 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1278 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1538 | 1458 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1522 | 1445 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1611 | 1509 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1471 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1412 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1413 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1472 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1503 | 1457 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1534 | 1457 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1449 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1556 | 1459 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1547 | 1454 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1529 | 1437 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1527 | 1422 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1280 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1332 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1288 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1261 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1258 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1444 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 13, 2026 | June 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.32 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $1.28 |
| Coding index | 81.0 | 33.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when output tokens cost 7.8x less.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?
49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.