Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Gemini 4 Argon leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 81.0 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 8.0x less per output token ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
81.0
Overall
84.0
Output $/M
$10.00
52
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$1.25
0
vs boards won of 52 shared

Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.4 Nano: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
52
Gemini 4 Argon only
42
GPT-5.4 Nano only
33
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 43.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Gemini 4 Argon 99.0% against GPT-5.4 Nano 5.0%, 94.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsGPT-5.4 NanoTies
Coding70
Intelligence20
Agentic work40
Reasoning90
Math60
Knowledge70
General170
All shared boards520
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev1678Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured56.1Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%26.1%Gemini 4 Argon
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%14.5%Gemini 4 Argon
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%41.6%Gemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode61.8%47.2%Gemini 4 Argon
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MirrorCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ALE-Bench2100.11004.5Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: coding15461404Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: software and IT15561402Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev: React1692Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1643Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Intelligence Index52.620.7Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4146.0Gemini 4 Argon
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured16.0Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1157Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench long agentic69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%38.2%Gemini 4 Argon
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%5.0%Gemini 4 Argon
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%6.3%Gemini 4 Argon
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%44.8%Gemini 4 Argon
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured76.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench reasoning95.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured73.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%28.3%Gemini 4 Argon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%78.5%Gemini 4 Argon
ARC-AGI98.5%51.5%Gemini 4 Argon
ARC-AGI-291.3%5.7%Gemini 4 Argon
Chess puzzles59.0%45.0%Gemini 4 Argon
Mystery game puzzles64.0%9.0%Gemini 4 Argon
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15461381Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: expert15501396Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15481387Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1210Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1225Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured39.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AIMENot measured88.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%87.8%Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%44.9%Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%12.2%Gemini 4 Argon
ProofBench99.0%5.0%Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: math15361405Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: mathematical work15571409Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%77.9%Gemini 4 Argon
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%41.0%Gemini 4 Argon
SimpleQA Verified76.0%11.7%Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: science15481374Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15551369Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: legal and government15481368Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: business and finance15251366Gemini 4 Argon
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Design Arena: websites1315Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: UI components1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: game dev1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: data viz1332Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: 3D1388Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1329Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench design73.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%38.1%Gemini 4 Argon
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%77.1%Gemini 4 Argon
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured47.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBenchNot measured75.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%76.7%Gemini 4 Argon
DTBench97.6%80.3%Gemini 4 Argon
LMCA63.7%36.9%Gemini 4 Argon
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text15321372Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: instruction following15341362Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: creative writing15271315Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena VisionNot measured1196Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English15381381Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: non-English15221359Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Chinese16111391Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1368Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1343Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1321Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1395Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Spanish15031371Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: Russian15341363Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1366Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15561382Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: longer queries15471365Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: writing and language15291338Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15271325Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1202Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1232Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1204Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1161Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1159Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.4 Nano
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonOpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026March 17, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.25
Coding index81.044.8
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.14
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5.4 Nano for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.4 Nano?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.4 Nano?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.4 Nano comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Nano's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gpt-5-4-nano" title="Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.4 Nano, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gpt-5-4-nano">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.4 Nano</a></p>