Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 4 Argon leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 52.6 to 5.5, and GPT-3.5 Turbo costs 6.7x less per output token ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
Coding
80.9
Overall
83.8
Output $/M
$10.00
5
GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-3.5 Turbo: which to pick

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 80.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
5
Gemini 4 Argon only
97
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
8
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Argon 80.9 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 51.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMCA: Gemini 4 Argon 63.7% against GPT-3.5 Turbo 9.7%, 54.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Argon takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 ArgonBarsGPT-3.5 TurboTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev1673Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured10.7Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)91.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Code migration (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode61.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierSWE55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MirrorCode58.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ALE-Bench2100.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: coding1539Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1544Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: React1688Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1640Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SciCode12.3%0.0%Gemini 4 Argon
SWE-Bench Pro V299.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index52.65.5Gemini 4 Argon
Epoch Capabilities Index166.4Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1172Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench research83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench long agentic69.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SREBench (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)27.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)44.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vals Science Index55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
APEX-Agents82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Vending-Bench 2$13,718Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured30.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveBench reasoning95.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.7%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ARC-AGI-291.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Mystery game puzzles64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
EBR-bench64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured61.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: expert1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1534Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)53.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 386.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
GSM8KNot measured57.8%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: math1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1549Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MathArena69.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.3%64.4%Gemini 4 Argon
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedCode (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
SimpleQA Verified76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MMLUNot measured68.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: science1542Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1537Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1512Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
PRBench Finance49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
PRBench Legal49.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: UI components1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: game dev1376Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: data viz1331Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: 3D1386Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1329Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench design73.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Vals Index69.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LiveBench data analysis85.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
DTBench97.6%48.5%Gemini 4 Argon
LMCA63.7%9.7%Gemini 4 Argon
Furniture assembly72.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text1526Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1523Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: English1526Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: non-English1519Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1600Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: French1543Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1508Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Russian1537Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: Polish1530Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1547Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1524Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1517Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
MultiChallenge78.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Argon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.0070Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Argon$0.500Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-3.5 Turbo
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 ArgonOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026May 28, 2023
Context window1.05M16K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.50
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.50
Coding index80.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-3.5 Turbo for coding?

Only Gemini 4 Argon has a coding score, 80.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Gemini 4 Argon, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-3.5 Turbo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next