Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.3
Gemini 4 Argon leads GLM 5.3 on coding, 81.0 to 70.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GLM 5.3 costs 2.3x less per output token ($4.40 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 80 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 4 Argon or GLM 5.3: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 70.6 for GLM 5.3, though on 5 benchmarks against 6.
Pick GLM 5.3 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($4.40 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) or LiveBench design, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 80
- Gemini 4 Argon only
- 13
- GLM 5.3 only
- 20
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon scores 81.0 against 70.6.
5 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads, 52.6 against 44.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 53.1.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GLM 5.3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 88.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GLM 5.3 has a MMLU Pro result, 86.8%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads, 1315 against 1295.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon leads, 69.2% against 59.7%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3
Gemini 4 Argon $0.0070, GLM 5.3 $0.0036 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GLM 5.3 has the number, $0.36.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 4 Argon 81.0 from 5 benchmarks, GLM 5.3 70.6 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 26.8 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench browser: Gemini 4 Argon 92.0% against GLM 5.3 0.0%, 92.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 4 Argon $10.00 against GLM 5.3 $4.40 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Bars | GLM 5.3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 17 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 12 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 9 | 0 | ||
| Math | 6 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 7 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 1 | ||
| General | 17 | 1 | 1 tie | |
| All shared boards | 76 | 3 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index171
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 89.7% | 82.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1621 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 74.8 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.5% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 95.4% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 38.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 91.9% | 78.1% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 68.2% | 44.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.5% | 1.5% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 100.0% | 68.4% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 57.7% | 71.5% | GLM 5.3 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 56.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 21.2% | 20.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.5% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 77.9% | 72.1% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 59.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierCode | 47.5% | 40.1% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | 30.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 75.4% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2100.1 | 1317.4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1546 | 1497 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1556 | 1493 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1692 | 1641 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1643 | 1595 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SciCode | 12.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 52.6 | 44.8 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.4 | 156.0 | Gemini 4 Argon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 53.1 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1194 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1189 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1254 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1142 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LiveBench research | 83.1% | 73.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | 0.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LiveBench long agentic | 69.9% | 35.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 44.3% | 9.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 65.4% | 55.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 44.6% | 39.7% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 54.8% | 49.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 27.1% | 14.6% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 75.2% | 56.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 76.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 44.3% | 5.7% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Vals Science Index | 55.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 52.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 4.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| APEX-Agents | 82.4% | 56.6% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $13,718 | $8,164 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 88.1% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 95.1% | 85.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 45.5% | 23.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 91.7% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 57.1% | 42.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 96.4% | 90.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| Chess puzzles | 59.0% | 37.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Mystery game puzzles | 64.0% | 33.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| EBR-bench | 64.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1546 | 1490 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1550 | 1514 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1548 | 1496 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 91.1% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 86.0% | 68.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 78.0% | 29.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| ProofBench | 99.0% | 49.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: math | 1536 | 1495 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1557 | 1497 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 86.8% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.3% | 84.8% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.4% | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 58.8% | 42.9% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SimpleQA Verified | 76.0% | 41.0% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: science | 1548 | 1498 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1555 | 1481 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1548 | 1473 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1525 | 1459 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1315 | 1295 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1331 | 1314 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1375 | 1311 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1336 | 1259 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1389 | 1332 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1329 | 1304 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1293 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1213 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench design | 73.7% | 77.3% | GLM 5.3 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index171
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 69.2% | 59.7% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LiveBench data analysis | 85.2% | 70.2% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 69.8% | 68.5% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 53.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 87.4% | 88.8% | GLM 5.3 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.7% | 79.7% | Tie |
| DTBench | 97.6% | 87.7% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMCA | 63.7% | 55.5% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Furniture assembly | 72.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Argon measured |
| LMArena Text | 1532 | 1474 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1534 | 1479 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1527 | 1458 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: English | 1538 | 1482 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1522 | 1459 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1611 | 1532 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1488 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1460 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1460 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1503 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1503 | 1462 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1534 | 1469 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1466 | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1556 | 1472 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1547 | 1483 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1529 | 1469 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1527 | 1447 | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 5.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 5.3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 5.3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 4 Argon | Z.ai GLM 5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 13, 2026 | August 18, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $1.40 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $4.40 |
| Coding index | 81.0 | 70.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.36 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM 5.3 for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Argon for coding: it scores 81.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 70.6 for GLM 5.3, though on 5 benchmarks against 6. Pick GLM 5.3 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($4.40 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) or LiveBench design, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GLM 5.3?
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GLM 5.3 costs $1.40 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or GLM 5.3?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.3 comparison based on?
80 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 4 Argon's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GLM 5.3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.