LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mercury 2

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
Coding
70.5
Overall
40.9
Output $/M
$4.125
39
Mercury 2Inception
Coding
0.0
Overall
10.8
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash for coding: it scores 70.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2.

Pick Mercury 2 when output tokens cost 5.5x less.

Shared results
39
Gemini 3.8 Flash only
87
Mercury 2 only
3
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.8 Flash 70.5 from 2 benchmarks, Mercury 2 0.0 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 39.2 points apart on average over 9 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Gemini 3.8 Flash 1577 against Mercury 2 1160, 69.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.8 Flash $4.125 against Mercury 2 $0.75 per million output tokens, 5.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 2 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.8 FlashBarsMercury 2Ties
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Knowledge30
Web design80
General120
All shared boards390
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
LiveBench coding82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15851171Gemini 3.8 Flash
AA Coding Index76.331.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)78.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)56.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SciCode56.6%37.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.5%Only Mercury 2 measured
FrontierCode41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierSWE19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
WeirdML84.8%43.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ALE-Bench1269.7785.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: coding15081390Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT15071385Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React15771160Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML16161199Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1593Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.910.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
AA Agentic Index40.21.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: agents building web apps1238Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1078Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1273Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1178Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1052Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench research79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vals Science Index35.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured70.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
APEX-Agents64.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Remote Labor Index5.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,094Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
GPQA Diamond94.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)95.3%77.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.8%17.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-289.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Chess puzzles58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15091362Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15261358Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15041374Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1351Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 368.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProofBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1532Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1519Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
MMLU Pro90.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science15231343Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15081363Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance14791349Gemini 3.8 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
Design Arena: websites13011036Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1318998Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: game dev1305985Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12691009Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1295982Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories13041022Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1295998Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art1264990Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveBench design72.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
Vals Index56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured69.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%43.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
DTBench95.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMCA52.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Furniture assembly31.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text14991354Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14921328Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14881286Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision1315Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14981378Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14911330Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15531414Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: German1501Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1507Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1496Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian15141304Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15031357Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries15071329Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14941300Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14801314Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1318Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.0029Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.054Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.206Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.8 FlashInception Mercury 2
MakerGoogleInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026March 4, 2026
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.825$0.25
Output $/Mtok$4.125$0.75
Coding index70.50.0
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$2.74Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Mercury 2 for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash for coding: it scores 70.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2. Pick Mercury 2 when output tokens cost 5.5x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Mercury 2?

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.825 per million input tokens and $4.125 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.8 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Mercury 2?

Gemini 3.8 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mercury 2 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.8 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mercury 2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next