Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Inkling

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads Inkling on coding, 39.8 to 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling costs 2.2x less per output token ($4.05 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 85 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.5 Flash Replace Inkling
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
78
T InklingThinking Machines
Coding
31.5
Overall
46.5
Output $/M
$4.05
6
vs boards won of 85 shared, 1 tied

Gemini 3.5 Flash or Inkling: which to pick

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for Inkling, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.

Pick Inkling for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($4.05 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.76 against $1.21).

Model AGemini 3.5 FlashGoogle39.8/1004 independent benchmarks$1.21 per solved taskModel BInklingThinking Machines31.5/1006 independent benchmarks$0.76 per solved task
Shared results
85
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
27
Inkling only
17
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 16.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3.5 Flash 72.1% against Inkling 36.5%, 35.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsInklingTies
Coding1411 tie
Intelligence20
Agentic work51
Reasoning120
Math60
Knowledge92
Web design80
General222
All shared boards7861 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index141
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev14991414Gemini 3.5 Flash
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.1Only Inkling measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%85.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%77.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%0.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%19.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%11.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%47.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured7.3%Only Inkling measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%26.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Inkling measured
SciCode53.9%47.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierSWENot measured4.1%Only Inkling measured
WeirdML62.6%32.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ALE-Bench911.0946.0Inkling
LMArena Text: coding14931466Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14941465Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React14951404Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15221399Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.625.0Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9148.4Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps12021196Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1174Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1184Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1142Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1179Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.9%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench browserNot measured16.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured14.1%Only Inkling measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%46.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%15.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%28.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Inkling measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%38.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-Agents27.5%33.8%Inkling
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%87.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.3%Only Inkling measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%78.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%87.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%31.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%88.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI92.5%79.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI-272.1%36.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SimpleBench76.7%50.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Chess puzzles45.0%21.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14881451Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14951466Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14831448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%88.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%33.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%4.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProofBench31.0%0.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: math15041479Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14951460Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index92
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
MMLU Pro89.5%86.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%83.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%68.6%Inkling
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%75.3%Inkling
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%64.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%41.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SimpleQA Verified66.2%40.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: science14951455Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14831447Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14881448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14671438Gemini 3.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
Design Arena: websites12681224Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: UI components12731201Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: game dev12631166Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12361159Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: 3D12441161Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories12661206Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: SVG12541110Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art12541089Gemini 3.5 Flash
LiveBench designNot measured58.3%Only Inkling measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index222
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
Vals IndexNot measured29.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.8%Only Inkling measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%58.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%36.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%85.4%Inkling
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%49.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
IFBench76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%77.3%Inkling
DTBench94.7%87.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMCA47.1%37.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text14821442Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14671425Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14701390Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14811442Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14751434Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15271493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German14941445Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14861429Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14481403Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14901455Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14801449Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14931430Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish15161450Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14811437Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14831435Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14781404Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14591394Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashInklingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
Inkling$0.0030Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
Inkling$0.061Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
Inkling$0.235Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and Inkling
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashThinking Machines Inkling
MakerGoogleThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 19, 2026July 17, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.975
Output $/Mtok$9.00$4.05
Coding index39.831.5
Independent measurements behind it46
Cost per solved task$1.21$0.76
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Inkling for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for Inkling, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick Inkling for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($4.05 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.76 against $1.21).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Inkling?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $0.975 and $4.05. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.21 and Inkling $0.76.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Inkling?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Inkling comparison based on?

85 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Inkling, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Inkling</a></p>