Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 leads Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on coding, 66.7 to 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 2.4x less per output token ($2.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Replace Grok 4.7
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
33
Grok 4.7xAI
Coding
66.7
Overall
66.6
Output $/M
$6.00
36
vs boards won of 69 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.7: which to pick

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($2.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Model AGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle49.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.41 per solved taskModel BGrok 4.7xAI66.7/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
69
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
16
Grok 4.7 only
30
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 22.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 10.3% against Grok 4.7 61.4%, 51.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsGrok 4.7Ties
Coding29
Intelligence02
Agentic work05
Reasoning38
Math15
Knowledge42
General235
All shared boards3336
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index29
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured84.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev14351637Grok 4.7
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured28.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%86.2%Grok 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%44.8%Grok 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%Grok 4.7
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured57.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%73.4%Grok 4.7
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.9%Only Grok 4.7 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%69.5%Grok 4.7
SciCode41.3%57.8%Grok 4.7
FrontierCodeNot measured47.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierSWENot measured29.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531432Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT14511421Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev: React14081663Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1627Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image14481586Grok 4.7
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.246.4Grok 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9154.4Grok 4.7
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveBench researchNot measured86.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured60.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured50.1%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%52.3%Grok 4.7
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%34.2%Grok 4.7
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%47.1%Grok 4.7
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured18.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%67.0%Grok 4.7
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured10.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured34.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
APEX-Agents29.3%54.6%Grok 4.7
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$10,537Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index38
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured82.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%43.1%Grok 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%92.7%Grok 4.7
ARC-AGI53.5%90.2%Grok 4.7
ARC-AGI-210.3%61.4%Grok 4.7
Chess puzzles21.0%41.0%Grok 4.7
Mystery game puzzles19.0%29.0%Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411415Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: expert14341439Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401427Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: diagrams12841254Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: homework12911309Grok 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%98.1%Grok 4.7
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%53.0%Grok 4.7
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%17.1%Grok 4.7
ProofBench13.0%26.0%Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: math14341414Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331435Grok 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%84.4%Grok 4.7
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%49.5%Grok 4.7
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured56.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science14511419Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381395Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: legal and government14311423Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: business and finance14231389Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1254Only Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1275Only Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1235Only Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1270Only Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1271Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index235
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
Vals IndexNot measured58.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.9%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%65.6%Grok 4.7
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%40.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%89.4%Grok 4.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%80.0%Grok 4.7
DTBench83.5%96.0%Grok 4.7
LMCA37.6%49.4%Grok 4.7
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text14351399Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following14191406Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing14211381Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision12691231Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: English14381411Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English14271386Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese14681449Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: German14541366Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Japanese14261359Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean14071383Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: French14511431Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Spanish14411406Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Russian14431399Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish14371420Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451394Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14351416Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language14281394Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141376Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: English12691229Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: Chinese13111250Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: reading text12801241Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12601217Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGrok 4.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.0050Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.118Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.460Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Grok 4.7
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteSpaceXAI Grok 4.7
MakerGooglexAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M500K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$6.00
Coding index49.066.7
Independent measurements behind it35
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Grok 4.7 for coding?

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($2.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?

69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-grok-4-7" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.7, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-grok-4-7">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.7</a></p>