Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 71.9 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs 1.7x less per output token ($12.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 53 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Replace Muse Wonder

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle

Coding: 32.3
Overall: 54.0
Output $/M: $12.00

Muse WonderMeta

Coding: 71.9
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $20.00

vs boards won of 53 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($12.00 vs $20.00 per million) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) or DTBench, where it leads.

Model AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle32.3/1004 independent benchmarks$0.99 per solved task Model BMuse WonderMeta71.9/1003 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task

53807

Shared results: 53
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only: 80
Muse Wonder only: 7
Like-for-like categories: 7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder scores 71.9 against 32.3.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a AA Intelligence Index result, 29.7.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a AA Agentic Index result, 8.2.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a GPQA Diamond result, 95.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a AIME result, 98.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a MMLU Pro result, 91.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads, 1362 against 1233.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Muse Wonder has a Vals Index result, 64.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $0.0080, Muse Wonder $0.014 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the number, $0.99.
Directional only

At a glance

Coding index: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category: Coding, 25.6 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap: Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 2.5% against Muse Wonder 49.5%, 62.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window: Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Category	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder
Coding	0	11
Agentic work	0	8
Reasoning	0	5
Math	0	3
Knowledge	0	4
Web design	0	6
General	2	14
All shared boards	2	51

CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011

Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
LMArena WebDev	1447	1652	Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index	68.8	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)	88.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)	78.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)	2.5%	49.5%	Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)	32.0%	83.1%	Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)	17.3%	62.5%	Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)	0.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)	51.8%	66.9%	Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)	70.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)	Not measured	45.6%	Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)	6.7%	26.6%	Muse Wonder
CyberBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	80.4%	Only Muse Wonder measured
SciCode	58.7%	60.3%	Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)	53.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench	80.2%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench	22.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML	72.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode	8.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench	1160.6	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding	1484	1522	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT	1487	1515	Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React	1438	1641	Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML	1490	1694	Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: from an image	1481	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode	14.3%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared

Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
AA Intelligence Index	29.7	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Epoch Capabilities Index	Not measured	161.8	Only Muse Wonder measured

Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08

Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
AA Agentic Index	8.2	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps	1125	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps	1068	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps	1094	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps	1049	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games	1236	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games	1113	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides	1103	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides	1041	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets	Not measured	1243	Only Muse Wonder measured
SREBench (Vals AI)	0.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)	43.0%	56.6%	Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)	9.3%	36.3%	Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)	20.7%	50.5%	Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)	Not measured	23.8%	Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)	52.6%	67.1%	Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)	60.0%	67.0%	Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)	1.4%	22.9%	Muse Wonder
Vals Science Index	27.4%	39.1%	Muse Wonder
CUA-bench (Vals AI)	Not measured	7.2%	Only Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench Telecom	95.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents	35.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons	77.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG	57.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench	47.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench	22.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2	$911	$9,432	Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here

ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05

Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
GPQA Diamond	95.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)	20.7%	27.5%	Muse Wonder
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)	88.2%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)	94.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)	47.0%	50.1%	Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)	94.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI	98.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-2	77.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench	79.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles	51.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles	34.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-bench	14.3%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts	1485	1506	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert	1483	1513	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English	1480	1506	Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams	1311	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework	1316	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here

MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03

Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
AIME	98.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME	95.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3	59.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 4	26.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench	26.0%	84.0%	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math	1486	1486	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work	1478	1514	Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here

KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04

Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
MMLU Pro	91.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)	87.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)	64.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)	64.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)	72.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)	69.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)	96.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)	59.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified	73.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science	1497	1506	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare	1486	1512	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government	1487	1505	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance	1459	1483	Muse Wonder
FACTS Benchmark Suite	67.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06

Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
Design Arena: websites	1233	1362	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components	1224	1379	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev	1202	1376	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz	1209	1317	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D	1234	1427	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories	1231	1371	Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG	1285	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art	1270	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index214

General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
Vals Index	Not measured	64.9%	Only Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)	53.8%	70.2%	Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)	48.7%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)	76.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index	56.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench	77.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)	82.0%	80.7%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DTBench	97.1%	95.2%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMCA	53.8%	56.8%	Muse Wonder
CL-bench	20.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly	26.7%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench	26.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life	16.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text	1480	1502	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following	1466	1491	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing	1482	1491	Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision	1296	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English	1478	1507	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English	1476	1492	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese	1527	1537	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German	1490	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese	1491	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean	1455	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French	1487	1523	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish	1481	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian	1497	1522	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish	1498	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn	1487	1510	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries	1482	1493	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language	1481	1496	Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media	1465	1482	Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English	1287	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese	1364	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text	1304	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor	1322	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning	1345	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things	1330	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing	1324	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document	1444	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here

Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared

Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Muse Wonder	Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Wonder
Specification	Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Meta Muse Wonder
Maker	Google	Meta
Weights	No public weights listed	No public weights listed
Released	February 19, 2026	October 12, 2026
Context window	1.05M	1.05M
Input $/Mtok	$2.00	$4.00
Output $/Mtok	$12.00	$20.00
Coding index	32.3	71.9
Independent measurements behind it	4	3
Cost per solved task	$0.99	Not computable
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($12.00 vs $20.00 per million) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) or DTBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Wonder?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-meta-muse-wonder" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-meta-muse-wonder">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder</a></p>

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Which one for your work

Coding

Intelligence

Agentic work

Reasoning

Math

Knowledge

Web design

General

Long documents

Everyday cost

Cost per solved task

At a glance

Benchmark by benchmark

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Agent loop

Specification differences

Questions

Compare next