Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Inkling
Inkling leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.0 to 15.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 1.6x less per output token ($2.50 vs $4.05 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 48 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash or Inkling: which to pick
Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.05 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.76).
- Shared results
- 48
- Gemini 2.5 Flash only
- 25
- Inkling only
- 54
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Inkling has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Inkling
Inkling leads, 25.0 against 15.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Inkling has a AA Agentic Index result, 22.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Inkling has a GPQA Diamond result, 87.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Inkling has a MMLU Pro result, 86.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Inkling
Inkling leads, 1224 against 1074.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Inkling has a Vals Index result, 29.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.0015, Inkling $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.466, Inkling $0.76.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 17.4 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI: Gemini 2.5 Flash 33.3% against Inkling 79.5%, 46.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Bars | Inkling | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 8 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 7 | ||
| General | 3 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 45 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 28.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1414 | Only Inkling measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.1 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.2% | Only Inkling measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 26.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 14.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 4.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 32.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 946.0 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1423 | 1466 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1425 | 1465 | Inkling |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1404 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1399 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.5 | 25.0 | Inkling |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.9 | 148.4 | Inkling |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 22.5 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1196 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 59.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 16.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 14.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.4% | Only Inkling measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.4% | Only Inkling measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 33.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| BALROG | 33.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $549 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 56.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | 39.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 87.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 78.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 78.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.0% | 87.2% | Inkling |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.1% | 31.9% | Inkling |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| ARC-AGI | 33.3% | 79.5% | Inkling |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | 36.5% | Inkling |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | 50.0% | Inkling |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 21.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1422 | 1451 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1426 | 1466 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1420 | 1448 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1245 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1244 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 73.3 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 88.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 33.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 4.9% | Only Inkling measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1411 | 1479 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1422 | 1460 | Inkling |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 40.4% | 41.2% | Inkling |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 40.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1433 | 1455 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1428 | 1447 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1430 | 1448 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1404 | 1438 | Inkling |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 47.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1074 | 1224 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1002 | 1198 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1004 | 1165 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1060 | 1156 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1020 | 1160 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1059 | 1205 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1020 | 1108 | Inkling |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1089 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 58.3% | Only Inkling measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index319
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 29.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 72.8% | Only Inkling measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 44.8% | 36.5% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 83.0% | 85.4% | Inkling |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Inkling measured |
| IFBench | 50.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 65.3% | 77.3% | Inkling |
| DTBench | 76.5% | 87.5% | Inkling |
| LMCA | 27.5% | 37.6% | Inkling |
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1442 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1405 | 1425 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1400 | 1390 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1418 | 1442 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1409 | 1434 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1449 | 1493 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: German | 1417 | 1445 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1396 | 1429 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1385 | 1403 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: French | 1432 | 1455 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1422 | 1449 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1415 | 1430 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1413 | 1450 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1408 | 1437 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1419 | 1435 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1405 | 1404 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1393 | 1394 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1239 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1284 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1237 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1225 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1277 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1252 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1241 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash | Thinking Machines Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Thinking Machines | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 17, 2025 | July 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.975 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $4.05 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 31.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.466 | $0.76 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Inkling for coding?
Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.05 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.76).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Inkling?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $0.975 and $4.05. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and Inkling $0.76.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Inkling?
Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Inkling comparison based on?
48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.