Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 4 Maverick

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads Llama 4 Maverick on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick costs 2.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
47
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
21.8
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 47 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 4 Maverick: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Maverick has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.98 per million).

Shared results
47
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
31
Llama 4 Maverick only
38
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 40.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 90.5% against Llama 4 Maverick 4.4%, 86.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Llama 4 Maverick $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding70
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning80
Math20
Knowledge90
General180
All shared boards470
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured15.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
AA Coding Index68.816.3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%47.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode51.0%31.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%24.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ALE-Bench1403.2173.0DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: coding14691301DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14621299DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1566Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.09.3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6132.2DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic Index41.30.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%69.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%67.1%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%4.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%4.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI-261.3%0.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SimpleBenchNot measured27.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581281DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14591259DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631295DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured55.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIMENot measured25.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math IndexNot measured19.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math14411299DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431295DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%79.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%77.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%49.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%66.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%36.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science14571288DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461275DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: legal and government14591286DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14421260DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured871Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured896Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured837Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured882Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured900Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured879Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%54.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
IFBenchNot measured43.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%50.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%61.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%15.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured46.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text14461287DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14481267DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14391266DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English14571303DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14311269DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14811277DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1291Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1206Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: Korean14491203DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: French14461259DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Spanish14351293DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Russian14481286DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1275Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541289DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14581280DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14431277DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241250DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0008Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.021Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.080Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026April 5, 2025
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.35
Output $/Mtok$1.98$1.00
Coding index56.1Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$0.10$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Maverick has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Maverick for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.98 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 4 Maverick?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.35 and $1.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.10 and Llama 4 Maverick $1.491.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 4 Maverick?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Maverick's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next