LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
83.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
31
T InklingThinking Machines
Coding
49.7
Overall
25.0
Output $/M
$4.05
0
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.7 for Inkling.

Inkling is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
31
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
1
Inkling only
71
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83.3 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling 49.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 33.1 points apart on average over 9 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 87.7% against Inkling 19.2%, 68.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 6.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsInklingTies
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work80
Reasoning20
Web design80
General30
All shared boards310
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%64.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641414DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.1Only Inkling measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only Inkling measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured77.6%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%0.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%19.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%11.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured7.3%Only Inkling measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Inkling measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Inkling measured
SciCode55.9%47.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierCodeNot measured14.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierSWENot measured4.1%Only Inkling measured
WeirdMLNot measured32.3%Only Inkling measured
ALE-Bench1622.0946.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1465Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671404DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871399DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.525.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.4Only Inkling measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1196Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1238Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%59.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench browser76.0%16.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%14.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%46.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%15.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%28.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%3.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%38.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.8%Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.1%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%78.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured78.5%Only Inkling measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.2%Only Inkling measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%31.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.3%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGINot measured79.5%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
SimpleBenchNot measured50.0%Only Inkling measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1451Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only Inkling measured
ProofBenchNot measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1479Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.3%Only Inkling measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Inkling measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.3%Only Inkling measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Inkling measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.3%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1447Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1438Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
Design Arena: websites13121224DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13051200DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13651166DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301160DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13681161DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13351206DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1109Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12441089DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%58.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
Vals Index61.3%29.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench data analysis79.5%72.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Inkling measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Inkling measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured49.4%Only Inkling measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%77.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Inkling measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Inkling measured
LMArena TextNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1425Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1390Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1434Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1493Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1403Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1449Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1450Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1435Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1394Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InklingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Inkling$0.0030Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Inkling$0.062Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Inkling$0.240Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Thinking Machines Inkling
MakerDeepSeekThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026July 17, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.05
Coding index83.349.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.76
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Inkling for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.7 for Inkling. Inkling is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Inkling?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $1.00 and $4.05. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Inkling?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling</a></p>