Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on coding, 70.3 to 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
7
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
32
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
18
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 52.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 87.7% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 15.7%, 72.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math10
Knowledge10
All shared boards70
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%15.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0608.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%84.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Chess puzzles46.0%8.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%17.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%86.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%25.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1310Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1352Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.80
Coding index70.339.5
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20</a></p>