Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Qwen3.5-Flash on coding, 70.3 to 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5-Flash costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.26 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
10
Qwen3.5-FlashQwen
Coding
41.1
Overall
50.1
Output $/M
$0.26
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5-Flash: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.26 vs $0.60 per million).

Shared results
10
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
29
Qwen3.5-Flash only
45
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-Flash 41.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 54.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1667 against Qwen3.5-Flash 1229, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Qwen3.5-Flash $0.26 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsQwen3.5-FlashTies
Coding40
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge10
All shared boards100
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641244DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured64.4%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0265.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1412Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1416Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671229DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871291DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.5Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured82.8%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.9%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%82.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Chess puzzles46.0%14.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%20.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1403Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1407Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1409Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
AIMENot measured92.5%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%84.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%18.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1407Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1413Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.1%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured56.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.6%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%20.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1415Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1407Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1398Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1310Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1352Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
DTBenchNot measured82.9%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMCANot measured29.1%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1397Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1374Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1404Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1390Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1369Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1344Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1413Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1380Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1376Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1393Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1392Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1369Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1347Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0040Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5-Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5-Flash
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026February 25, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.065
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.26
Coding index70.341.1
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.40
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Qwen3.5-Flash for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash. Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.26 vs $0.60 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.065 and $0.26. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5-Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5-Flash comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-5-flash-02-23" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-5-flash-02-23">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5-Flash</a></p>