Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.7

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Grok 4.7 on coding, 70.3 to 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 10.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
28
Grok 4.7xAI
Coding
66.7
Overall
66.6
Output $/M
$6.00
8
vs boards won of 36 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.7: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 66.7 for Grok 4.7, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Grok 4.7 for work measured by Code migration (Vals AI) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
36
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
3
Grok 4.7 only
63
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 16.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 46.3% against Grok 4.7 17.1%, 29.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGrok 4.7Ties
Coding62
Intelligence01
Agentic work44
Reasoning50
Math30
Knowledge01
Web design70
General30
All shared boards288
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index62
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%84.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641637DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%28.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%86.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%44.8%Grok 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured57.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured73.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.9%Only Grok 4.7 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SciCode55.9%57.8%Grok 4.7
FrontierCodeNot measured47.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierSWENot measured29.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1432Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1421Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671663DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871627DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1586Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.546.4Grok 4.7
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.4Only Grok 4.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index44
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%86.4%Grok 4.7
LiveBench browser76.0%60.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%50.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%52.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%34.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%47.1%Grok 4.7
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%18.3%Grok 4.7
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%67.0%Grok 4.7
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured10.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured34.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$10,537Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%82.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%43.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%92.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ARC-AGINot measured90.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured61.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%41.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%29.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1415Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1439Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1427Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1309Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%98.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%53.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%17.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1414Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%56.0%Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1419Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1395Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1423Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1389Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
Design Arena: websites13111255DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13031275DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571314DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301238DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581274DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321273DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: ASCII art1242Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%78.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
Vals Index61.3%58.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench data analysis79.5%76.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured65.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured89.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%80.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured96.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMCANot measured49.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1399Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1406Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1381Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1231Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1411Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1386Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1449Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1366Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1359Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1383Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1431Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1406Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1420Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1394Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1416Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1394Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1376Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1229Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1250Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1241Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1217Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.7
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017SpaceXAI Grok 4.7
MakerDeepSeekxAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M500K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding index70.366.7
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Grok 4.7 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 66.7 for Grok 4.7, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Grok 4.7 for work measured by Code migration (Vals AI) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-grok-4-7" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.7, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-grok-4-7">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.7</a></p>