Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on coding, 70.3 to 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
22
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
1
vs boards won of 24 shared, 1 tied

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for work measured by SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Shared results
24
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
15
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
54
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 10.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 31.8% against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 14.1%, 23.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Ties
Coding80
Intelligence10
Agentic work50
Reasoning301 tie
Math30
Knowledge01
General20
All shared boards2211 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641582DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured68.8Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured96.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%14.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%82.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%41.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured51.6%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode55.9%51.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierCodeNot measured28.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdMLNot measured66.2%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1622.01403.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1469Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1462Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671588DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871566DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.536.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.6Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured41.3Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%50.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%26.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%40.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%10.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%52.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured47.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%41.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%91.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ARC-AGINot measured90.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured61.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%46.0%Tie
Mystery game puzzles49.0%43.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1458Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1459Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1463Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%98.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%64.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%26.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProofBenchNot measured50.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1441Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1443Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%52.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1446Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1459Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1442Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Design Arena: websites1310Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1352Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1306Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Vals Index61.3%53.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%80.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured93.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCANot measured45.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1446Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1448Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1439Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1457Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1431Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1449Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1446Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1435Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1448Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1454Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1458Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1443Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1424Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
MakerDeepSeekDeepSeek
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 12, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.98
Coding index70.356.1
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.10
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for work measured by SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 and $1.98. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-deepseek-v4-pro-0813" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-deepseek-v4-pro-0813">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813</a></p>