Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads DeepSeek V3.2 on coding, 62.4 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V3.2 costs 6.8x less per output token ($0.88 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 55 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
55
vs boards won of 55 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.88 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.99 against $1.32).

Shared results
55
DeepSeek V3.2 only
20
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
58
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V3.2 5.1% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 64.7%, 59.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 6.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding09
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge08
Web design07
General020
All shared boards055
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index09
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev13621674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding Index44.276.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%85.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%64.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: coding14531502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14491498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React13501692Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML13711649Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.545.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1196Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1233Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured967Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%63.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond80.3%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14341496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14361507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14461503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14351501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro84.9%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%83.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14461512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14251492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14101480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11751275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components11461338Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev11311312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11581281Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D11321336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11631293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art10831200Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench85.6%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA28.8%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text14251483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14131481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14001477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14391491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14091473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14551539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14131478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese13741473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13701460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14291498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14241489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14241482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14191471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14281488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14071477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13951464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.88$6.00
Coding index30.062.4
Independent measurements behind it35
Cost per solved task$0.99$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.88 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.99 against $1.32).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.99 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

55 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>