Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Command A on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 13.1, and Muse Spark 1.3 costs 2.4x less per output token ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

Command A or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
39
Command A only
23
Muse Spark 1.3 only
53
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 52.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI): Command A 17.6% against Muse Spark 1.3 72.3%, 54.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index27.875.8Muse Spark 1.3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%72.3%Muse Spark 1.3
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%59.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13301510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT13361511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.148.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.2Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic Index1.055.5Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%58.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)46.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert12961519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math13001497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: science13391507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government13481499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance13151490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1356Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1349Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1328Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1343Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1358Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1352Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench61.3%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA10.3%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text13311490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following13091479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing13191462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English13441495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English13131481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese13271532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German13421513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese12851470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean12851490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French13511511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish13471496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian13141491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish13241490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13341488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language13281470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkCommand AMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationCohere Command AMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerCohereMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Muse Spark 1.3?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next