Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 46 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$3.75
46
vs boards won of 46 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
46
Command A only
14
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
66
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 50.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI): Command A 7.8% against Gemini 3.7 Flash 80.8%, 73.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGemini 3.7 FlashTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge08
General021
All shared boards046
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured80.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1591Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
AA Coding Index27.871.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%88.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%80.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%77.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%59.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured20.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured904.3Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding13301499Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT13361498Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1587Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1593Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1599Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.139.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured158.0Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1208Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1232Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1248Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1264Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1235Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1022Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured56.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured28.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%59.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured5.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%93.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%94.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%47.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured84.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured66.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert12961512Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1320Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured71.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured36.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13001511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121502Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%90.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%87.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%74.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%53.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured69.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science13391511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341494Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13481496Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13151479Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1304Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1318Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured73.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%83.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%83.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
DTBench61.3%96.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMCA10.3%50.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text13311489Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13091484Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13191488Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English13441483Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13131487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese13271552Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German13421506Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese12851511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean12851481Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French13511500Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13471495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13141515Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish13241503Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381485Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries13341492Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13281491Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061477Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1309Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash
SpecificationCohere Command AGoogle Gemini 3.7 Flash
MakerCohereGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025August 13, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.75
Output $/Mtok$10.00$3.75
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.0
Independent measurements behind it16
Cost per solved task$2.69$1.78
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Command A costs $2.69 and Gemini 3.7 Flash $1.78.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next