Command A+ vs GPT-6 Astra
Command A+ costs 33.3x less per output token than GPT-6 Astra ($1.50 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
Command A+Cohere
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
- Coding
- 85.1
- Overall
- 83.0
- Output $/M
- $50.00
vs $1.50 vs $50.00 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 33.3x cheaper.
Command A+ or GPT-6 Astra: which to pick
Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Command A+ for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $50.00 per million).
Model ACommand A+CohereNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-6 AstraOpenAI85.1/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; GPT-6 Astra on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-6 Astra has a AA Intelligence Index result, 52.7.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-6 Astra has a AA Agentic Index result, 51.0.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-6 Astra has a Design Arena: websites result, 1337.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GPT-6 Astra has a Vals Index result, 65.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+
Command A+ $0.0010, GPT-6 Astra $0.035 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-6 Astra 85.1 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-6 Astra $50.00 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
- Context window
- Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-6 Astra 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index25 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 93.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1774 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 76.9 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 89.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 100.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.1% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 56.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 53.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 65.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 79.4% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 93.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 46.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 2951.3 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1489 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1474 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1798 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1775 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1726 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 12.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 52.7 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 168.8 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 51.0 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1373 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1357 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1315 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1348 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1243 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1361 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 85.2% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 82.4% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 56.9% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.4% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.1% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.9% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 65.1% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 90.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.2% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 23.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 64.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Remote Labor Index | Not measured | 20.8% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 68.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SpireClimb | Not measured | 25.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $15,515 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 92.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.1% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 96.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 54.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 95.8% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 98.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 95.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 74.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 76.2% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1463 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1489 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1464 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1297 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1337 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 100.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 93.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 97.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 99.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1465 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1484 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.5% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 75.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1451 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1425 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1462 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1439 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 75.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1337 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1396 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1475 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1334 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1500 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1379 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1431 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1353 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 82.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 65.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 83.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.4% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.9% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 80.7% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 97.3% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 64.4% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 80.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1441 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1455 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1420 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1280 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1447 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1432 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1489 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1459 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1428 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1432 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1422 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1438 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1422 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1447 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1460 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1437 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1427 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1280 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1361 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1292 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1286 | Only GPT-6 Astra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.035Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.650Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
GPT-6 Astra$2.50Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A+ | OpenAI GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | September 4, 2026 |
| Context window | 192K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $10.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $50.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 85.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A+ better than GPT-6 Astra for coding?
Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A+ for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $50.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-6 Astra?
Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 and $50.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra, with 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and GPT-6 Astra?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; GPT-6 Astra on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.