Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads GPT-6.1 Terra on coding, 87.3 to 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-6.1 Terra costs 2.0x less per output token ($5.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
Coding
87.3
Overall
81.7
Output $/M
$10.00
24
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
8
vs boards won of 34 shared, 2 tied

Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Terra: which to pick

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding: it scores 87.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 77.4 for GPT-6.1 Terra.

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($5.00 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
34
Claude Sonnet 5.5 only
68
GPT-6.1 Terra only
2
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 87.3 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 13.3 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 5.5 42.0% against GPT-6.1 Terra 15.2%, 26.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 5.5 $10.00 against GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 5.5 takes 1M tokens, GPT-6.1 Terra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5.5BarsGPT-6.1 TerraTies
Coding71
Intelligence10
Agentic work61
Reasoning41
Math021 tie
Knowledge01
Web design50
General121 tie
All shared boards2482 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index71
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
LiveBench coding94.7%94.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev17701673Claude Sonnet 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)64.1%49.5%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)92.4%84.0%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)6.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)58.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SciCode61.0%55.1%Claude Sonnet 5.5
FrontierCode52.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE61.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ALE-Bench1819.12608.8GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: coding1512Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1504Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React18171657Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML17391719Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1737Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SciCode13.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V295.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AA Intelligence Index54.251.0Claude Sonnet 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index166.2Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1306Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1286Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1292Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench research83.6%73.9%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench browser89.3%93.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
LiveBench long agentic63.4%48.6%Claude Sonnet 5.5
SREBench (Vals AI)30.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)42.0%15.2%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%26.0%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.4%1.7%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)81.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index59.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents75.5%68.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
SpireClimb1.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$11,165Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
LiveBench reasoning91.6%88.7%Claude Sonnet 5.5
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)55.0%46.2%Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.6%94.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
ARC-AGI96.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-283.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles65.0%74.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
EBR-benchNot measured78.1%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1494Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1527Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1501Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1329Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1331Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)37.5%35.7%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%100.0%Tie
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 388.8%90.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
FrontierMath, tier 480.5%92.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
ProofBench100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1504Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1513Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified46.5%57.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: science1487Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1476Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1485Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1466Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Design Arena: websites13221283Claude Sonnet 5.5
Design Arena: UI components13731277Claude Sonnet 5.5
Design Arena: game dev14121348Claude Sonnet 5.5
Design Arena: data viz1367Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1398Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories13521295Claude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench design85.0%82.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Vals Index70.8%60.5%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench data analysis59.5%82.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)67.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)91.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%82.7%Tie
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMCA68.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly75.0%79.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text1473Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1492Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1470Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1484Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1456Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1537Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1425Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1457Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1498Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1447Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1461Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1468Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1494Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1474Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1460Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1289Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1297Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1242Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured74.2%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.0070Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.500Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request

GPT-6.1 Terra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2026October 26, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$5.00
Coding index87.377.4
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than GPT-6.1 Terra for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding: it scores 87.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 77.4 for GPT-6.1 Terra. Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($5.00 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Terra?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Terra?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-6.1 Terra's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-gpt-6-1-terra" title="Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-gpt-6-1-terra">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra</a></p>