Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads Claude Sonnet 4.5 on coding, 50.0 to 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 44.6x less per output token ($0.336 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 56 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick
Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 56
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
- 39
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 24
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 scores 50.0 against 39.5.
3 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 21.8 against 20.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Tied at 15.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads, 81.6% against 81.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a AIME result, 88.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads, 87.4% against 82.9%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 1265 against 1189.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $0.011, MiMo-V2.5 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $1.16, MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 9.3 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.6% against MiMo-V2.5 42.2%, 19.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 44.6x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Bars | MiMo-V2.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 7 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| Reasoning | 4 | 1 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 10 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 17 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 37 | 18 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1394 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| AA Coding Index | 52.1 | 56.8 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 73.0% | 81.5% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 70.0% | 71.0% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 22.6% | 42.2% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 43.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 41.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 14.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Cybench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 514.0 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1488 | 1469 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1473 | 1463 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | 1425 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1429 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 20.7 | 21.8 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.7 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 15.8 | 15.8 | Tie |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1060 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1050 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1137 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 36.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 90.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| METR time horizons | 67.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 42.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $3,839 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 73.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.6% | 81.6% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 79.3% | 80.0% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 84.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 27.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 82.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 10.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| VPCT | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1462 | 1450 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1483 | 1459 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1471 | 1461 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1269 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1262 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 77.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 23.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ProofBench | 19.0% | 16.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MATH level 5 | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1449 | 1436 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1462 | 1451 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.4% | 82.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 78.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 62.0% | 59.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.3% | 71.8% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.0% | 59.3% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.1% | 31.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1448 | 1440 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1444 | 1432 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1451 | 1425 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1440 | 1432 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1189 | 1265 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1170 | 1255 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1166 | 1249 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1167 | 1250 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1157 | 1215 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1182 | 1260 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1115 | 1179 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1205 | 1140 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index172
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 36.1% | 43.3% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.5% | 72.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 52.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 67.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 73.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| DTBench | 83.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | 38.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1438 | 1428 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1459 | 1435 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1442 | 1393 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1247 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1447 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1425 | 1405 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1460 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1427 | 1421 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1390 | 1306 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1402 | 1361 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1459 | 1448 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1458 | 1414 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1437 | 1396 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1423 | 1413 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1465 | 1445 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1475 | 1445 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1442 | 1409 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1428 | 1399 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1259 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1326 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1256 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1226 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1189 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1230 | Only MiMo-V2.5 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 29, 2025 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.168 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.336 |
| Coding index | 39.5 | 50.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.16 | $0.01 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?
Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $1.16 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?
56 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.