Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on coding, 39.5 to 38.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs 5.0x less per output token ($2.976 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: which to pick
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 are level for coding, 39.5 against 38.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.976 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.57 against $1.16). Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 69
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
- 26
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Level: 39.5 against 38.7, inside 2 points.
3 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 leads, 30.4 against 20.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 leads, 26.3 against 15.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 leads, 89.4% against 81.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a AIME result, 88.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads, 87.4% against 87.3%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 leads, 1234 against 1189.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $0.011, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $0.0028 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $1.16, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $0.57.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 38.7 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 8.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.6% against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 49.9%, 27.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $2.976 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Bars | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 3 | 1 tie | |
| Math | 3 | 2 | 1 tie | |
| Knowledge | 6 | 5 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 4 | 16 | ||
| All shared boards | 23 | 44 | 2 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index28
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1394 | 1447 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| AA Coding Index | 52.1 | 59.4 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 73.0% | 87.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 70.0% | 77.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.1% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 22.6% | 49.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 26.2% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.2% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.3% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 17.6% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 14.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | 48.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Cybench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1006.1 | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1488 | 1470 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1473 | 1469 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | 1441 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1435 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 20.7 | 30.4 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.7 | 149.1 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 15.8 | 26.3 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1060 | 1000 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1050 | 948 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1137 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1059 | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.1% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.2% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 23.1% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.6% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| METR time horizons | 67.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 42.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $3,839 | $3,285 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 73.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.6% | 89.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 82.3% | 90.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| ARC-AGI | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 10.0% | 19.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | 17.0% | Tie |
| EBR-bench | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| VPCT | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1462 | 1461 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1483 | 1463 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1471 | 1466 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | 53.5% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 77.8% | 96.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 23.9% | 45.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | 2.4% | Tie |
| ProofBench | 19.0% | 16.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MATH level 5 | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1449 | 1443 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1462 | 1455 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index65
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.4% | 87.3% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 80.3% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.2% | 59.4% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 62.0% | 61.4% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.3% | 72.1% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.1% | 40.5% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | 47.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1448 | 1470 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1444 | 1466 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1451 | 1464 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1440 | 1443 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1189 | 1234 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1170 | 1219 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1166 | 1228 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1167 | 1203 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1157 | 1253 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1182 | 1240 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1115 | 1139 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1205 | 1149 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index416
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.9% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 36.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.5% | 75.1% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| DTBench | 83.2% | 90.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMCA | 38.8% | 41.2% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 40.0% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 13.5% | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1438 | 1451 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1459 | 1445 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1442 | 1446 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1459 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1425 | 1439 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1460 | 1481 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1427 | 1458 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1390 | 1446 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1402 | 1409 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1459 | 1473 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1458 | 1457 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1437 | 1453 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1423 | 1461 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1465 | 1468 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1475 | 1458 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1442 | 1447 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1428 | 1431 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 29, 2025 | April 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $1.358 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $2.976 |
| Coding index | 39.5 | 38.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.16 | $0.57 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 are level for coding, 39.5 against 38.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.976 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.57 against $1.16). Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $1.358 and $2.976. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $1.16 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $0.57.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 comparison based on?
69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.