Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Updated October 21, 2026. 75 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
vs boards won of 75 shared
Decision reading
Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 81.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when output tokens cost 3.3x less.
Model AClaude Opus 5Anthropic81.8/1002 independent benchmarks$1.33 per solved taskModel BMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI9.2/1001 independent benchmark$6.02 per solved task
- Shared results
- 75
- Claude Opus 5 only
- 55
- Mistral Medium 3.5 only
- 5
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 scores 81.8 against 9.2.
2 and 1 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 leads, 50.8 against 14.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 leads, 56.5 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 leads, 93.4% against 34.9%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 leads, 91.6% against 75.3%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 leads, 1309 against 1142.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 takes 1M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.5
Claude Opus 5 $0.018, Mistral Medium 3.5 $0.0053 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 $1.33, Mistral Medium 3.5 $6.02.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 5 81.8 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 9.2 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 45.1 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Claude Opus 5 99.0% against Mistral Medium 3.5 9.0%, 90.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 5 $25.00 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 5 takes 1M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 5 | Bars | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 12 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 9 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 8 | 0 | ||
| General | 28 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 75 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 90.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1689 | 1264 | Claude Opus 5 |
| AA Coding Index | 78.0 | 46.9 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 89.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 97.0% | 66.4% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 88.4% | 2.9% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 57.5% | 5.1% | Claude Opus 5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 3.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 84.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 84.6% | 39.0% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 28.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 60.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 65.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SciCode | 56.4% | 40.2% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 33.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | 53.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 91.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2164.6 | 764.0 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1533 | 1460 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1527 | 1458 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1711 | 1254 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1680 | 1308 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1662 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 50.8 | 14.2 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.9 | 141.4 | Claude Opus 5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 56.5 | 7.0 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1266 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1306 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1348 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1258 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1279 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1261 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1265 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 84.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 62.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 12.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.6% | 32.1% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 45.5% | 4.5% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.3% | 9.1% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 73.6% | 11.2% | Claude Opus 5 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 27.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 47.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 18.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 9.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 65.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 31.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| BALROG | 63.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 35.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $11,182 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1242 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | 34.9% | Claude Opus 5 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 91.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 37.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 89.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.7% | 74.8% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 54.9% | 13.8% | Claude Opus 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 97.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 43.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 59.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 45.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1527 | 1436 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1554 | 1432 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1523 | 1445 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1348 | 1254 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1338 | 1230 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 85.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 73.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| ProofBench | 99.0% | 9.0% | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1533 | 1431 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1544 | 1440 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 91.6% | 75.3% | Claude Opus 5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 73.2% | 58.8% | Claude Opus 5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.1% | 68.0% | Claude Opus 5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 72.1% | 28.9% | Claude Opus 5 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 63.6% | 33.8% | Claude Opus 5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1531 | 1428 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1525 | 1409 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1530 | 1437 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1501 | 1426 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1309 | 1142 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1348 | 1079 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1339 | 1079 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1329 | 1120 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1335 | 1061 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1324 | 1122 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1310 | 949 | Claude Opus 5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1352 | 1062 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LiveBench design | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index280
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 74.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 76.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 49.4% | 37.6% | Claude Opus 5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.0% | 67.7% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 73.9% | 34.8% | Claude Opus 5 |
| IFBench | Not measured | 68.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.0% | 69.3% | Claude Opus 5 |
| DTBench | 97.9% | 75.5% | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMCA | 64.5% | 26.1% | Claude Opus 5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 26.9% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 60.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1509 | 1421 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1518 | 1415 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1493 | 1374 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1320 | 1222 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1508 | 1433 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1502 | 1404 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1573 | 1444 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1527 | 1453 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1520 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1517 | 1384 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1519 | 1448 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1523 | 1411 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1507 | 1395 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1522 | 1430 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1500 | 1423 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1517 | 1415 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1499 | 1384 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1481 | 1382 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1315 | 1240 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1400 | 1244 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1329 | 1233 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1293 | 1216 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1313 | 1198 | Claude Opus 5 |
| LMArena Document | 1516 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Opus 5$0.018Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Opus 5$0.325Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Opus 5$1.25Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 24, 2026 | April 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $5.00 | $1.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $25.00 | $7.50 |
| Coding index | 81.8 | 9.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.33 | $6.02 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 5 better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?
Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 81.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when output tokens cost 3.3x less.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 5 costs $1.33 and Mistral Medium 3.5 $6.02.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Claude Opus 5, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?
75 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.