Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 14B
Claude Opus 5.5 leads Qwen3 14B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 57.6 to 6.7, and Qwen3 14B costs 87.0x less per output token ($0.23 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 9 shared
Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 14B: which to pick
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a coding score, 88.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 14B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3 14B for output tokens 87.0x cheaper ($0.23 vs $20.00 per million).
Model AClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic88.8/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 14BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
- Shared results
- 9
- Claude Opus 5.5 only
- 100
- Qwen3 14B only
- 11
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 leads, 57.6 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1335.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a Vals Index result, 70.2%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1M tokens against 41K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 14B
Claude Opus 5.5 $0.014, Qwen3 14B $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 5.5 88.8 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3 14B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 56.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Claude Opus 5.5 84.7% against Qwen3 14B 0.0%, 84.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 5.5 $20.00 against Qwen3 14B $0.23 per million output tokens, 87.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 14B 41K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | Bars | Qwen3 14B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 3 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 9 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 96.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1807 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 18.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 95.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 30.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 74.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 52.3% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| SciCode | 66.9% | 30.7% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 5.3% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2147.4 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1545 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1538 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1855 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1753 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1753 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SciCode | 18.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 57.6 | 6.7 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 168.8 | 138.2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1316 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1308 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1368 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 50.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 9.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 58.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 14.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 34.5% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 21.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SpireClimb | 3.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,235 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 41.0% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 92.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 60.4% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.4% | 4.5% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.6% | 63.8% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 71.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 71.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1536 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1549 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1535 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1345 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1362 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 49.1% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 58.0 | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 58.0% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 66.4% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 91.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1518 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1516 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 77.4% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1524 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1509 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1518 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1494 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 65.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1335 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1385 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1461 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1397 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1476 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1390 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1329 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 40.5% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 84.7% | 0.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| DTBench | 98.9% | 64.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMCA | 68.2% | 18.2% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 62.5% | Only Qwen3 14B measured |
| Furniture assembly | 83.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1516 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1537 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1535 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1519 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1507 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1582 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1534 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1493 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1508 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1517 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1501 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1532 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1532 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1515 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1317 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1326 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1320 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$0.260Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0062Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 14B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$1.00Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.024Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 14B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | April 28, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M | 41K |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.11 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $0.23 |
| Coding index | 88.8 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Qwen3 14B for coding?
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a coding score, 88.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 14B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 14B for output tokens 87.0x cheaper ($0.23 vs $20.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 14B?
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B costs $0.11 and $0.23. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 14B?
Claude Opus 5.5, with 1M tokens against 41K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 14B comparison based on?
9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 14B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.