Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro on coding, 67.5 to 19.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs 2.5x less per output token ($10.00 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 73 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Claude Opus 4.7 Replace Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
71.6
Output $/M
$25.00
71
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Coding
19.1
Overall
41.8
Output $/M
$10.00
2
vs boards won of 73 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($10.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.64 against $2.95).

Model AClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved taskModel BGemini 2.5 ProGoogle19.1/1003 independent benchmarks$0.64 per solved task
Shared results
73
Claude Opus 4.7 only
30
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
17
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro 19.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 45.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Claude Opus 4.7 75.8% against Gemini 2.5 Pro 4.9%, 71.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 against Gemini 2.5 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.7 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7BarsGemini 2.5 ProTies
Coding120
Intelligence20
Agentic work30
Reasoning110
Math50
Knowledge81
General301
All shared boards712
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured53.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev15581226Claude Opus 4.7
AA Coding Index73.633.3Claude Opus 4.7
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%54.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)71.0%0.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
SciCodeNot measured46.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)54.5%26.5%Claude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench80.2%32.6%Claude Opus 4.7
FrontierCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GSO-Bench44.1%3.9%Claude Opus 4.7
WeirdML76.4%54.0%Claude Opus 4.7
MirrorCode31.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding15191452Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: software and IT15161459Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: React1560Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML15541235Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an image15771285Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index40.716.1Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8145.1Claude Opus 4.7
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
AA Agentic Index38.61.6Claude Opus 4.7
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)23.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.6%54.1%Claude Opus 4.7
APEX-Agents49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GDPvalNot measured23.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
OSWorld 2.018.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured41.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
PostTrainBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2$10,937$574Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Search1230Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured29.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond90.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.4%84.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.3%22.5%Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%85.3%Claude Opus 4.7
ARC-AGI93.5%41.0%Claude Opus 4.7
ARC-AGI-275.8%4.9%Claude Opus 4.7
SimpleBench61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles28.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
EBR-bench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061455Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: expert15211452Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15081453Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: diagrams13361274Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: homework13371281Claude Opus 4.7
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%70.3%Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
AIME96.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured87.7Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.7%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%84.7%Claude Opus 4.7
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 370.2%24.6%Claude Opus 4.7
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%0.0%Claude Opus 4.7
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: math14981450Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work15091454Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index81
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
MMLU Pro89.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.4%63.9%Claude Opus 4.7
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%60.8%Claude Opus 4.7
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.3%68.9%Claude Opus 4.7
MedCode (Vals AI)54.9%50.6%Claude Opus 4.7
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
SimpleQA Verified51.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science15081480Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14951476Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: legal and government15041480Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance14901439Claude Opus 4.7
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.5%61.5%Gemini 2.5 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1167Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1137Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1111Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1222Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1080Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1152Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index301
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)56.1%41.9%Claude Opus 4.7
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%73.5%Claude Opus 4.7
Vals Multimodal Index67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
IFBench58.6%48.7%Claude Opus 4.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.7%69.0%Claude Opus 4.7
DTBench94.7%82.4%Claude Opus 4.7
LMCA52.2%34.8%Claude Opus 4.7
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Furniture assembly33.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ExploitBench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text14901458Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: instruction following14981437Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing14861454Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision13171263Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: English14961458Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: non-English14801452Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Chinese15311507Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: German14951487Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Japanese14741461Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean14641434Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: French15031473Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Spanish14941474Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Russian14941461Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Polish14891479Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: multi-turn15051453Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries15051449Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: writing and language14921454Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14741441Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: English13221261Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: Chinese13711300Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: reading text13271270Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: humor13091262Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1304Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12781283Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: creative writing13261265Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Document14951421Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.0063Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.092Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.350Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.7Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 16, 2026June 17, 2025
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$25.00$10.00
Coding index67.519.1
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved task$2.95$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($10.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.64 against $2.95).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 and $10.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $2.95 and Gemini 2.5 Pro $0.64.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison based on?

73 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.7's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 2.5 Pro's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gemini-2-5-pro" title="Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gemini-2-5-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro</a></p>