Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Claude Opus 4.6 on coding, 61.1 to 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Step 5 Preview costs 9.3x less per output token ($2.70 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.2
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$25.00
32
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
7
vs boards won of 39 shared

Claude Opus 4.6 or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.2 for Claude Opus 4.6.

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
39
Claude Opus 4.6 only
71
Step 5 Preview only
22
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 57.2 from 4 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 11.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Japanese: Claude Opus 4.6 1488 against Step 5 Preview 1383, 17.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 9.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding34
Intelligence01
Reasoning51
Math30
Knowledge40
General171
All shared boards327
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index34
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev15471567Step 5 Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench79.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
WeirdML78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding15341485Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT15271473Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React15391583Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML15591556Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image15431550Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index31.943.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index155.7Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1206Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1207Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1212Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents46.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond89.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-269.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15251461Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15441485Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15301454Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams13401308Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: homework13371265Claude Opus 4.6
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProofBench50.0%42.0%Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: math15181458Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work15251460Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro89.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science15191454Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15041439Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government15121437Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14971435Claude Opus 4.6
FACTS Benchmark Suite41.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1291Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1281Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1277Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1273Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1288Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1227Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index171
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
IFBench53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench91.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMCA55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text15011440Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following15211438Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing15051409Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision13161265Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: English15111447Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14881428Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese15511500Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: German1500Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese14881383Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French15121438Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish15101441Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14971433Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish1499Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15111437Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries15181449Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language15021425Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14921412Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: English13241290Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text13261282Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerAnthropicStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$25.00$2.70
Coding index57.261.1
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$1.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.2 for Claude Opus 4.6. Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Step 5 Preview?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="Claude Opus 4.6 vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.6 vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>