Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 3 Flash Preview on coding, 57.2 to 43.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 8.3x less per output token ($3.00 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 51 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.2
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$25.00
34
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle
Coding
43.7
Overall
55.0
Output $/M
$3.00
15
vs boards won of 51 shared, 2 tied

Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 43.7 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.

Pick Gemini 3 Flash Preview for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($3.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $1.56).

Shared results
51
Claude Opus 4.6 only
59
Gemini 3 Flash Preview only
20
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 57.2 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Preview 43.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 15.6 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.6 57.6% against Gemini 3 Flash Preview 20.2%, 37.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against Gemini 3 Flash Preview $3.00 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 3 Flash Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsGemini 3 Flash PreviewTies
Coding62
Intelligence10
Agentic work70
Reasoning64
Math311 tie
Knowledge46
Web design40
General321 tie
All shared boards34152 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index62
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%75.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1547Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%85.6%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%75.0%Claude Opus 4.6
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%20.2%Claude Opus 4.6
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.4%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.9%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.8%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%38.6%Claude Opus 4.6
Terminal-Bench79.8%64.3%Claude Opus 4.6
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%9.8%Claude Opus 4.6
WeirdML78.0%61.6%Claude Opus 4.6
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1367.2Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1534Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1539Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1559Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SciCodeNot measured12.7%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index31.926.3Claude Opus 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index155.7Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps12061110Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps12201063Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps12071090Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: agents building Android apps11961050Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1161Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1212Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1036Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.8%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured18.3%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured26.0%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%80.4%Claude Opus 4.6
APEX-Agents46.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
BALROGNot measured48.1%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%49.8%Claude Opus 4.6
Vending-Bench 2$8,018$3,635Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index64
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond89.7%87.9%Claude Opus 4.6
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%87.6%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%89.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%36.6%Claude Opus 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%89.4%Claude Opus 4.6
ARC-AGI94.0%84.7%Claude Opus 4.6
ARC-AGI-269.2%33.6%Claude Opus 4.6
SimpleBench67.6%61.1%Claude Opus 4.6
Chess puzzles21.0%39.0%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Mystery game puzzles25.0%26.0%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
VPCTNot measured72.6%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1544Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1530Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1340Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
AIME95.6%95.6%Tie
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.3%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
AA Math IndexNot measured97.0Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured97.0%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%95.6%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%51.2%Claude Opus 4.6
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%17.1%Claude Opus 4.6
ProofBench50.0%15.0%Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: math1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index46
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro89.1%88.6%Claude Opus 4.6
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%86.9%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%55.8%Claude Opus 4.6
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%66.4%Claude Opus 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%73.9%Claude Opus 4.6
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%68.7%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%95.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%55.9%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%66.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
GeoBenchNot measured88.0%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
LMArena Text: science1519Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1504Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite41.5%63.4%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites12911196Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: UI components1284Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev12781166Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: data viz1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D12741184Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: all code categories12891189Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: SVG1228Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)51.6%51.8%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%69.9%Claude Opus 4.6
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured52.2%Only Gemini 3 Flash Preview measured
IFBench53.1%78.0%Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%78.0%Tie
DTBench91.2%89.1%Claude Opus 4.6
LMCA55.8%43.1%Claude Opus 4.6
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1501Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1521Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1505Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1511Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1551Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1500Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1510Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1499Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1511Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1492Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1324Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Flash PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.0020Fits in one request

Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.034Fits in one request

Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
Gemini 3 Flash Preview$0.130Fits in one request

Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6Google Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026December 17, 2025
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.50
Output $/Mtok$25.00$3.00
Coding index57.243.7
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved task$1.56$0.37
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Gemini 3 Flash Preview for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 43.7 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview. Pick Gemini 3 Flash Preview for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($3.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $1.56).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs $0.50 and $3.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $1.56 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview $0.37.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview comparison based on?

51 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3 Flash Preview's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-3-flash-preview" title="Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-3-flash-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview</a></p>