Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Claude Opus 4.5 leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on coding, 44.0 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 10.4x less per output token ($2.40 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 60 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Coding
44.0
Overall
55.7
Output $/M
$25.00
47
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
13
vs boards won of 60 shared

Claude Opus 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 for coding: it scores 44.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 10.4x cheaper ($2.40 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Shared results
60
Claude Opus 4.5 only
52
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
11
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.5 44.0 from 3 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 12.1 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Opus 4.5 36.0% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 2.0%, 34.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.5 $25.00 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5BarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding61
Intelligence20
Agentic work20
Reasoning62
Math31
Knowledge63
Web design80
General146
All shared boards4713
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index61
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
SWE-bench Verified79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual70.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1494Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.7%86.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)76.4%69.0%Claude Opus 4.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.6%7.6%Claude Opus 4.5
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)87.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%36.4%Claude Opus 4.5
Terminal-Bench63.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GSO-Bench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
WeirdML63.7%43.5%Claude Opus 4.5
Cybench82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding15031468Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14831468Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1478Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1510Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.122.9Claude Opus 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1146.0Claude Opus 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1159Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1156Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1188Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1176Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom89.5%83.3%Claude Opus 4.5
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
METR time horizons75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index3.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GDPval45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
BALROG43.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OSWorld66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,967Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MCP Atlas69.8%63.1%Claude Opus 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index62
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA Diamond85.9%86.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.6%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.1%28.4%Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.0%85.4%Claude Opus 4.5
ARC-AGI80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-237.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleBench62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles22.0%20.0%Claude Opus 4.5
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14761452Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14871472Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14821453Claude Opus 4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AIME95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)95.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AA Math Index91.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.1%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ProofBench36.0%2.0%Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: math14631457Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14681461Claude Opus 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index63
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%85.8%Claude Opus 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.6%82.1%Claude Opus 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.1%65.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%73.1%Claude Opus 4.5
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.2%38.6%Claude Opus 4.5
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GeoBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14541465Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441456Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: legal and government14591452Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14481434Claude Opus 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite43.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
PRBench Finance46.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
PRBench Legal44.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites12471145Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: UI components12361135Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: game dev12281138Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: data viz12431141Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: 3D12131131Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: all code categories12411146Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: SVG11801069Claude Opus 4.5
Design Arena: ASCII art11901100Claude Opus 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index146
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)52.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
IFBench58.0%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBench89.9%90.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMCA44.5%36.9%Claude Opus 4.5
CL-bench21.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text14511445Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14781418Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14451399Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: English14611455Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14381427Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14701497Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: German14491472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Japanese1417Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean14241384Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: French14711472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Spanish14571455Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14471417Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14391385Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14661411Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14791437Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14521406Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14341397Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Document1462Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MultiChallenge59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.018Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.325Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$1.25Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.5NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerAnthropicNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 24, 2025June 4, 2026
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.60
Output $/Mtok$25.00$2.40
Coding index44.030.0
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$1.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 for coding: it scores 44.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 10.4x cheaper ($2.40 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

60 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" title="Claude Opus 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra</a></p>