Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Claude Opus 4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.7 to 22.8, and Step 5 Preview costs 27.8x less per output token ($2.70 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
4
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
24
vs boards won of 28 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: creative writing or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Shared results
28
Claude Opus 4.1 only
45
Step 5 Preview only
33
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 20.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: Claude Opus 4.1 1399 against Step 5 Preview 1556, 26.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 27.8x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General410
All shared boards424
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev13901567Step 5 Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
WeirdML45.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14791485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14561473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.843.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14381485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math14311458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14221454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14211437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14061435Step 5 Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1176Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1162Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1171Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1166Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1152Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index410
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured88.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMCA37.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text14191440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following14351438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14121409Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14331447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14051428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14271500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13771383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1381Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: French14331438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14481441Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Russian14221433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441437Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14551449Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14181425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerAnthropicStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$15.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$75.00$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: creative writing or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next