Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads Claude Opus 4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 22.8, and Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 31.3x less per output token ($2.40 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
24
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
25
vs boards won of 49 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by WeirdML or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
49
Claude Opus 4.1 only
27
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
22
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 8.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.1 66.5% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 86.0%, 19.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 31.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding22
Intelligence02
Reasoning15
Math03
Knowledge44
Web design80
General99
All shared boards2425
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
LMArena WebDev1390Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%86.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdML45.9%43.5%Claude Opus 4.1
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14791467Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14561468Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.822.9Nemotron 3 Ultra
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1146.0Nemotron 3 Ultra
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA Diamond76.3%86.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%85.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%20.0%Claude Opus 4.1
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421452Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: expert14391472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511453Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: math14311457Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341462Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index44
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU Pro87.9%85.8%Claude Opus 4.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%82.1%Claude Opus 4.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%73.1%Claude Opus 4.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%38.6%Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: science14221465Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161455Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: legal and government14211453Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: business and finance14051435Nemotron 3 Ultra
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
PRBench Finance35.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
PRBench Legal34.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites11771145Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: UI components11621135Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: game dev11711138Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: data viz11661142Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: 3D11541132Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: all code categories11701146Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: SVG11521069Claude Opus 4.1
Design Arena: ASCII art11671100Claude Opus 4.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index99
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
DTBench80.0%90.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMCA37.1%36.9%Claude Opus 4.1
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text14191445Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: instruction following14351418Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14121398Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: English14331454Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: non-English14051427Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Chinese14271498Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: German14131474Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13811385Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: French14331473Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Spanish14481454Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Russian14221417Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Polish14131385Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441411Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14551437Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14181405Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981397Claude Opus 4.1
MultiChallenge57.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerAnthropicNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025June 4, 2026
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$15.00$0.60
Output $/Mtok$75.00$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by WeirdML or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next