Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Inkling
Updated October 21, 2026. 53 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.7 for Inkling.
Pick Inkling when what matters is SimpleQA Verified or LiveBench data analysis, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 53
- Claude Haiku 5.5 only
- 9
- Inkling only
- 49
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 75.9 against 49.7.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads, 43.4 against 25.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Inkling has a AA Agentic Index result, 22.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Inkling has a GPQA Diamond result, 87.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Inkling has a MMLU Pro result, 86.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads, 1263 against 1224.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads, 58.7% against 29.0%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.0003, Inkling $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Inkling has the number, $0.76.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Haiku 5.5 75.9 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling 49.7 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 45.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Claude Haiku 5.5 89.0% against Inkling 0.0%, 89.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 8.1x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Inkling 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Bars | Inkling | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 14 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 10 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 7 | 0 | ||
| General | 7 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 51 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index140
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 91.4% | 64.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1586 | 1414 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.1 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 36.4% | 0.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.4% | 19.2% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.6% | 11.8% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.5% | 0.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 47.3% | 14.9% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 44.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 20.4% | 7.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 26.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 75.5% | 66.8% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SciCode | 55.0% | 47.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| FrontierCode | 46.4% | 14.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| FrontierSWE | 43.8% | 4.1% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 32.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 946.0 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1466 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1465 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1605 | 1404 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1569 | 1399 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 43.4 | 25.0 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.3 | 148.4 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 22.5 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1196 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench research | 81.9% | 59.9% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | 16.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 57.6% | 14.1% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 5.7% | 0.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 54.1% | 46.6% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.9% | 15.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 43.3% | 28.4% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 4.2% | 3.8% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 59.0% | 38.4% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 10.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 38.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 56.1% | 33.8% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $3,602 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 87.1% | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 82.4% | 78.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 35.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 78.5% | Only Inkling measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.2% | Only Inkling measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 44.4% | 31.9% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 89.6% | 88.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| ARC-AGI | 89.0% | 79.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | 36.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 50.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| Chess puzzles | 55.0% | 21.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 30.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 43.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1451 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1466 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1448 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.9% | 88.9% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 75.1% | 33.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 46.3% | 4.9% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| ProofBench | 89.0% | 0.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1479 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1460 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.6% | Only Inkling measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.3% | Only Inkling measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Inkling measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 51.5% | 41.2% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | 40.3% | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1455 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1447 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1448 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1438 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1263 | 1224 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1295 | 1200 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1315 | 1166 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1292 | 1160 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1343 | 1161 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1279 | 1206 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1109 | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1089 | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench design | 83.1% | 58.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 58.7% | 29.0% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LiveBench data analysis | 53.1% | 72.8% | Inkling |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 63.2% | 58.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.8% | 36.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 89.5% | 85.4% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Inkling measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.7% | 77.3% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| DTBench | 95.0% | 87.5% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| LMCA | 51.1% | 37.6% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| Furniture assembly | 47.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1442 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1425 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1390 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1442 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1434 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1493 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1445 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1429 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1403 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1455 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1449 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1430 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1450 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1437 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1435 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1404 | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1394 | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Inkling | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 | Thinking Machines Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 7, 2026 | July 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $1.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $4.05 |
| Coding index | 75.9 | 49.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.76 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Inkling for coding?
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.7 for Inkling. Pick Inkling when what matters is SimpleQA Verified or LiveBench data analysis, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Inkling?
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $1.00 and $4.05. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Inkling?
Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Inkling comparison based on?
53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.