LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Grok 4.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 34 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
75.9
Overall
43.4
Output $/M
$0.50
33
Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
22.5
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$2.50
1
vs boards won of 34 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.5 for Grok 4.3.

Pick Grok 4.3 when the benchmark that matters is SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Shared results
34
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
28
Grok 4.3 only
70
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 75.9 from 2 benchmarks, Grok 4.3 22.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 36.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Haiku 5.5 89.0% against Grok 4.3 11.0%, 78.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Grok 4.3 $2.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsGrok 4.3Ties
Coding70
Intelligence10
Agentic work50
Reasoning30
Math40
Knowledge11
Web design60
General60
All shared boards331
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev15861358Claude Haiku 5.5
AA Coding IndexNot measured42.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%19.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%6.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%0.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%48.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured944.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1415Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1416Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16051353Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15691367Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1375Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.424.9Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.5Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1126Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1006Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1059Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured967Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured914Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1007Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1008Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1012Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%37.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%6.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%15.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%18.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured97.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602$35Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena SearchNot measured1166Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%37.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%88.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%18.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1402Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%93.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%42.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%14.6%Claude Haiku 5.5
ProofBench89.0%11.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1387Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%38.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
SimpleQA Verified23.8%33.2%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1386Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1381Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
Design Arena: websites12631196Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: UI components12951192Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: game dev13151174Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: data viz12921180Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: 3D13431125Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: all code categories12791187Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1081Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%51.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%19.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%74.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured43.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
IFBenchNot measured83.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%75.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
DTBench95.0%90.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMCA51.1%38.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1397Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1366Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1380Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1229Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1404Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1422Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1395Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1354Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1411Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1393Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1257Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1217Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5SpaceXAI Grok 4.3
MakerAnthropicxAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.50
Coding index75.922.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.31
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Grok 4.3 for coding?

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.5 for Grok 4.3. Pick Grok 4.3 when the benchmark that matters is SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Grok 4.3?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Grok 4.3?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Grok 4.3 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next