Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Claude Fable 5 leads MiMo-V2.6-Pro on coding, 79.3 to 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 57.5x less per output token ($0.87 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 66 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.4 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for output tokens 57.5x cheaper ($0.87 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
- Shared results
- 66
- Claude Fable 5 only
- 61
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 scores 79.3 against 65.4.
6 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 leads, 49.6 against 46.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a MMLU Pro result, 91.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads, 1308 against 1295.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a Vals Index result, 57.8%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Claude Fable 5 $0.035, MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has the number, $2.16.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5 79.3 from 6 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 9.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ALE-Bench: Claude Fable 5 2041.3 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1158.1, 29.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5 $50.00 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 57.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5 | Bars | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 10 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 8 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 3 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 5 | ||
| General | 17 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 49 | 17 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index104
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 98.3% | 81.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1624 | 1625 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 76.5 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 89.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 41.4% | 31.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | 85.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 55.1% | 43.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.0% | 0.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 80.5% | 67.8% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SciCode | 61.0% | 60.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 78.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 91.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2041.3 | 1158.1 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1518 | 1533 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1513 | 1528 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1631 | 1639 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1651 | 1616 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1623 | 1598 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.6 | 46.3 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.4 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index82
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.7 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1261 | 1290 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1280 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1264 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1284 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1292 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1285 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1227 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1270 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 86.9% | 76.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | 88.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 53.2% | 47.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.3% | 57.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 38.3% | 32.4% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 49.5% | 47.1% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 73.7% | 62.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 15.7% | 2.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | 54.4% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,680 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1229 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 89.7% | 79.6% | Claude Fable 5 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 89.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 55.5% | 49.4% | Claude Fable 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 85.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 39.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1507 | 1511 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1534 | 1541 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1509 | 1520 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1357 | 1281 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1361 | 1264 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 90.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ProofBench | 95.0% | 70.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1516 | 1500 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1515 | 1511 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 91.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 71.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 56.1% | 45.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1506 | 1506 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1480 | 1497 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1498 | 1485 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1480 | 1468 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1295 | 1308 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1316 | 1340 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1335 | 1314 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1304 | 1336 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1318 | 1330 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1310 | 1317 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1302 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1329 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 84.7% | 78.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index172
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 57.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.5% | 72.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | 68.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 51.9% | 45.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.5% | 88.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 74.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| IFBench | 63.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.3% | 86.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| DTBench | 98.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMCA | 61.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 35.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1491 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1502 | 1491 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1494 | 1466 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1325 | 1263 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1498 | 1504 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1482 | 1474 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1543 | 1529 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1486 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1504 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1487 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1505 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1498 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1503 | 1479 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1494 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1504 | 1466 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1510 | 1501 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1501 | 1470 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1482 | 1465 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1323 | 1268 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1373 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1337 | 1270 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1341 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1338 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 9, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.435 |
| Output $/Mtok | $50.00 | $0.87 |
| Coding index | 79.3 | 65.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $2.16 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.4 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for output tokens 57.5x cheaper ($0.87 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Fable 5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?
66 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.