Claude Fable 5.1 vs Command A
Claude Fable 5.1 leads Command A on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 53.4 to 13.1, and Command A costs 5.0x less per output token ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 46 shared
Claude Fable 5.1 or Command A: which to pick
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a coding score, 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Command A for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million).
Model AClaude Fable 5.1Anthropic84.2/1005 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BCommand ACohereNot benchmarked1 independent benchmark$2.69 per solved task
- Shared results
- 46
- Claude Fable 5.1 only
- 78
- Command A only
- 16
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 53.4 against 13.1.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 57.9 against 1.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 93.4% against 48.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Command A has a AIME result, 13.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 92.4% against 69.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1313.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1M tokens against 256K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A
Claude Fable 5.1 $0.035, Command A $0.0075 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Command A has the number, $2.69.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.1 84.2 from 5 benchmarks, Command A not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 53.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI): Claude Fable 5.1 85.0% against Command A 17.6%, 67.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.1 $50.00 against Command A $10.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1M tokens, Command A 256K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Bars | Command A | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 0 | ||
| General | 21 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 46 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1743 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 81.6 | 27.8 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 90.5% | 35.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.8% | Only Command A measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 58.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 54.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 90.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 85.0% | 17.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 61.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 28.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 61.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 28.7% | Only Command A measured |
| SciCode | 63.1% | 38.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 25.0% | Only Command A measured |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2143.2 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1532 | 1330 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1530 | 1336 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1792 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1684 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1722 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 53.4 | 13.1 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.5 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 57.9 | 1.0 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1318 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1326 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1267 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1327 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1327 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1365 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveBench research | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 80.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 22.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.9% | 9.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 49.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 76.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 63.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 13.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 5.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 80.7% | Only Command A measured |
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SpireClimb | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,422 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1246 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 46.5% | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | 48.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 91.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 47.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 90.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.7% | 76.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.1% | 12.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| ARC-AGI | 97.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 48.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 58.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| EBR-bench | 57.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1528 | 1326 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1544 | 1296 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1522 | 1335 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1343 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1345 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 28.8% | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 13.3% | Only Command A measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.2% | Only Command A measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.7% | Only Command A measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 13.0 | Only Command A measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 13.0% | Only Command A measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 87.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1531 | 1300 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1541 | 1312 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 92.4% | 69.2% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.5% | 79.7% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.5% | Only Command A measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.0% | Only Command A measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.0% | 61.4% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 70.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.5% | Only Command A measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 53.5% | 19.7% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Command A measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1532 | 1339 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1531 | 1334 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1514 | 1348 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1493 | 1315 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1313 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1339 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1381 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1344 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1393 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1336 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1301 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1323 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveBench design | 83.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 74.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.3% | 55.7% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| IFBench | Not measured | 73.9% | Only Command A measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 85.3% | 52.7% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| DTBench | 97.6% | 61.3% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMCA | 65.5% | 10.3% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Furniture assembly | 70.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1512 | 1331 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1518 | 1309 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1509 | 1319 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1506 | 1344 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1508 | 1313 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1584 | 1327 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1499 | 1342 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1562 | 1285 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1517 | 1285 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1523 | 1351 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1520 | 1347 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1520 | 1314 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1525 | 1324 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1493 | 1338 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1524 | 1334 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1510 | 1328 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1497 | 1306 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1313 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1391 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1327 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1318 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1330 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Command A | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Fable 5.1$0.035Fits in one request
Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Command A costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.1$0.650Fits in one request
Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Command A costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.1$2.50Fits in one request
Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Command A costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 | Cohere Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 1, 2026 | March 13, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Input $/Mtok | $10.00 | $2.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $50.00 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 84.2 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $2.69 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Command A for coding?
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a coding score, 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Command A?
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Command A costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Command A?
Claude Fable 5.1, with 1M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.1 vs Command A comparison based on?
46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Fable 5.1's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Command A's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.